The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump and others rejected on Thursday arguments by the former president that the indictment seeks to criminalize political speech protected by the First Amendment.
Quick Read
- Judge’s Decision: The judge in the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump dismissed claims that the indictment infringes on First Amendment rights to free speech.
- Indictment Details: Issued in August by a Fulton County grand jury, the indictment accuses Trump and 18 others of trying to unlawfully overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia.
- Legal Argument: Trump’s legal team argued that the charges were based on political speech, which should be protected even if false. However, the judge ruled that the indictment alleges actions intended to harm the government, not merely false statements.
- First Amendment and Criminal Activity: The judge stated that even political speech can be subject to prosecution if it’s used to further criminal activities.
- Future Legal Challenges: While the judge rejected the First Amendment defense at this stage, he noted that Trump and the other defendants could revisit this argument later in the trial process.
- Legal Team’s Response: Trump’s lead attorney expressed disagreement with the judge’s order but acknowledged the opportunity to raise First Amendment challenges again in the future.
- Prosecution’s Stance: The Fulton County District Attorney’s office declined to comment on the judge’s ruling.
- Comparison to Federal Case: This ruling mirrors a decision in a federal election interference case against Trump, where it was noted that speech used as an instrument of a crime is not protected by the First Amendment.
- Case Progress: No trial date has been set for the Georgia case, which is one of four criminal cases against Trump. The district attorney has proposed an August trial start.
The Associated Press has the story:
Judge rejects Trump’s 1st Amendment challenge to indictment in GA election case
Newslooks- ATLANTA (AP) —
The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump and others rejected on Thursday arguments by the former president that the indictment seeks to criminalize political speech protected by the First Amendment.
The indictment issued in August by a Fulton County grand jury accused Trump and 18 others of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to illegally try to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia after the Republican incumbent narrowly lost the state to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump’s attorneys argued that all the charges against him involved political speech that is protected even if the speech ends up being false.
But Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote that at this pretrial stage he must consider the language of the indictment in a light favorable to the prosecution. The charges do not suggest that Trump and the others are being prosecuted simply for making false statements but rather that they acted willfully and knowingly to harm the government, he wrote.
“Even core political speech addressing matters of public concern is not impenetrable from prosecution if allegedly used to further criminal activity,” the judge wrote.
He added that even lawful acts involving speech protected by the First Amendment can be used to support a charge under Georgia’s anti-racketeering law, which prosecutors used in this case.
But McAfee did leave open the possibility that Trump and others could raise similar arguments “at the appropriate time after the establishment of a factual record.”
Steve Sadow, Trump’s lead attorney in Georgia, said in an email that Trump and the other defendants “respectfully disagree with Judge McAfee’s order and will continue to evaluate their options regarding the First Amendment challenges.” He called it significant that McAfee made it clear they could raise their challenges again later.
A spokesperson for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis declined to comment.
McAfee’s order echoes an earlier ruling in the federal election interference case against Trump brought by Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan wrote in December that “it is well established that the First Amendment does not protect speech that is used as an instrument of a crime.”
No trial date has been set for the sprawling Georgia case, one of four criminal cases pending against Trump as he seeks to return to the White House, though Willis has asked for the trial to begin in August. Four people have pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutors. Trump and the others who remain have pleaded not guilty.
