New Study Suggests Limit to Human Life Expectancy \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ A recent study suggests humanity is approaching an upper limit for life expectancy, despite medical and technological advancements. The study, led by S. Jay Olshansky, reveals that life expectancy improvements are slowing, particularly in countries with the longest-living populations. Researchers indicate that aging itself may be the key factor limiting further longevity gains.
Life Expectancy Reaching Limits Quick Looks
- A new study suggests humanity is nearing the limit of life expectancy.
- Advances in medical technology aren’t resulting in large gains in longevity.
- Study led by S. Jay Olshansky and published in Nature Aging.
- Life expectancy gains in countries like Japan and Switzerland are slowing.
- Women still live longer than men, but improvements are decelerating.
- Life expectancy grew by 2 ½ years per decade in 1990, now just 1 ½ years.
- The U.S. has almost no improvement, partly due to deaths from drugs, violence, and inequities.
- Researchers estimate eliminating all deaths before age 50 would add only 1 ½ years.
- The study suggests that technological advances are increasingly ineffective against aging.
- Former President Jimmy Carter recently joined the ranks of centenarians.
- Fewer than 15% of women and 5% of men may live to 100.
- Population growth may increase the number of centenarians, but percentages will remain low.
Deep Look
Humanity might be nearing the upper limit of life expectancy, according to a recent study published in the journal Nature Aging. Despite remarkable advancements in medical technology and genetic research, as well as a growing number of centenarians, researchers have found that these gains are not translating into significant jumps in overall lifespan. In fact, longevity improvements are showing signs of slowing, especially in countries known for having the longest-living populations.
“We have to recognize there’s a limit,” said S. Jay Olshansky, the study’s lead author and a researcher at the University of Illinois-Chicago. According to Olshansky, it may be time to reconsider assumptions about life expectancy, including when people should retire and how much money they will need for their later years. The new findings point to a plateau in life expectancy, suggesting that society may need to adjust its expectations for longevity and plan accordingly for a future where most people do not live dramatically longer lives.
The study tracked life expectancy from 1990 to 2019, focusing on eight of the world’s longest-living places: Australia, France, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, and Switzerland. The United States was also included, despite not ranking in the top 40 globally, largely because of its influence and past optimistic estimates predicting a surge in U.S. life expectancy.
Life expectancy is defined as the average number of years a baby born in a particular year might expect to live, assuming that current death rates remain constant. It is a critical health metric worldwide, though it comes with limitations. As a snapshot estimate, it cannot predict unexpected developments like pandemics, medical breakthroughs, or other events that could either increase or reduce lifespan dramatically.
Mark Hayward, a University of Texas researcher not involved in the study, praised it as “a valuable addition to the mortality literature.” He agreed that humanity appears to be “reaching a plateau” in life expectancy. Although scientific breakthroughs could theoretically extend life beyond current expectations, “we don’t have that now,” Hayward noted, suggesting that our understanding of aging remains insufficient to produce major longevity gains.
The study revealed that while improvements in life expectancy are ongoing, the rate of increase has slowed significantly over the past three decades. In 1990, the average life expectancy improvement was about 2 ½ years per decade in the eight countries studied. By the 2010s, this had dropped to just 1 ½ years per decade, with almost no gains in the U.S. The researchers found that women still consistently outlive men, though the rate of increase in female life expectancy is also decelerating.
The situation in the U.S. presents particular challenges, as various factors are contributing to reduced life expectancy, even before many Americans reach old age. Drug overdoses, gun violence, obesity, and healthcare inequities all play significant roles in driving down the average lifespan in the U.S. To underscore this point, the researchers conducted a hypothetical calculation where they eliminated all deaths before age 50 in all nine countries. Even under this idealized scenario, life expectancy increased by just 1 ½ years at best, Olshansky said, showing that there are fundamental limits to how much life expectancy can be extended even under ideal conditions.
Eileen Crimmins, a gerontology expert at the University of Southern California, echoed the study’s findings, emphasizing the particularly concerning trends in the United States. “For me personally, the most important issue is the dismal and declining relative position of the United States,” Crimmins said in an email. Her comments reflect broader concerns that, despite the country’s wealth and technological advances, the U.S. is struggling to achieve even modest gains in longevity compared to other developed nations.
The researchers propose that humanity might be approaching a biological ceiling for life expectancy, suggesting that there is a natural limit to how long most people can live. “We’re squeezing less and less life out of these life-extending technologies,” Olshansky said. “And the reason is, aging gets in the way.” Despite medical advancements that have eradicated many infectious diseases and improved chronic disease management, the fundamental biological processes of aging remain a significant barrier. While it is increasingly common to hear about individuals living to 100 — such as former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, who recently reached this milestone — such cases remain relatively rare on a population level.
In 2019, approximately 2% of Americans reached the age of 100, compared with about 5% in Japan and 9% in Hong Kong, according to Olshansky. The percentage of centenarians is likely to grow in the coming decades, but that increase is primarily attributed to general population growth rather than breakthroughs in extending human lifespan. Experts predict that fewer than 15% of women and only 5% of men will live to see their 100th birthdays in most countries.
The slowing pace of life expectancy gains prompts broader questions about the limitations of current medical technology and public health strategies. Researchers argue that while medical advancements have allowed people to manage many diseases that once cut lives short, they are proving less effective at extending maximum lifespan. As people age, a growing list of age-related diseases — including heart disease, cancer, and neurodegenerative conditions — increasingly limits further gains in life expectancy. This suggests that unless there is a fundamental shift in how we address the biology of aging, humanity may have already reached the peak of what is achievable through existing medical interventions.
The findings of this study have implications not only for healthcare but also for social policy. If life expectancy is reaching its limit, societies may need to rethink expectations around retirement age and financial planning for older adults. The assumption that people will continue living significantly longer lives has influenced a range of policies and personal decisions, from savings plans to healthcare costs. With life expectancy gains slowing, individuals and governments alike may need to adjust their strategies to ensure that older adults can enjoy a reasonable quality of life without overburdening social support systems.
The concept of a natural limit to human life expectancy also raises ethical and philosophical questions about how far society should go in its pursuit of extending life. The study suggests that the pursuit of significantly extending lifespan might be a misplaced effort if the primary obstacles are rooted in the unavoidable biology of aging. Instead, a shift in focus toward improving the quality of those later years — rather than simply increasing the number of years lived — could yield more tangible benefits for society as a whole.
In the years ahead, the number of centenarians will likely rise due to population growth, but as Olshansky points out, the percentages will remain low. While stories of people reaching the age of 100, like Jimmy Carter, may become more common in the media, the reality is that the vast majority of people will not reach that milestone. Instead of chasing dramatic gains in lifespan, the study suggests that society should focus on enhancing healthcare access, addressing preventable causes of death, and supporting individuals in maintaining health and independence throughout their older years.
