Philippine VP Sara Duterte Faces Investigation Amid Political Feud

Philippine VP Sara Duterte Faces Investigation Amid Political Feud \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte has been subpoenaed to address her remarks threatening President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., his wife, and the House speaker if she were harmed in a potential plot. Duterte, defending her statement as concern for her safety, faces legal scrutiny amid accusations of grave threats. The feud highlights the fallout between Marcos and Duterte, once election allies, as tensions rise over corruption allegations and governance differences.

Sara Duterte’s Subpoena: Quick Looks

• Subpoena Issued: Vice President Sara Duterte has been called to testify regarding her alleged threats.
• Marcos Response: President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. condemned the remarks as a criminal plot.
• Security Concerns: Police and military increased Marcos’s security due to national security concerns.
• Legal Implications: Philippine law considers such remarks a punishable crime of threats or sedition.
• Political Feud: The once-allied Marcos and Duterte camps have split over policy and corruption issues.
• Congressional Investigations: Duterte faces scrutiny over alleged misuse of government funds.

Deep Look

The escalating political feud between Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. reached new heights as authorities subpoenaed Duterte following incendiary remarks. Duterte allegedly threatened to have Marcos, his wife, and House Speaker Martin Romualdez assassinated if harm came to her in an unspecified plot. The comments have sparked legal, political, and national security concerns.

The Alleged Threat and Duterte’s Defense

On Tuesday, the National Bureau of Investigation issued a subpoena requiring Duterte to appear Friday and clarify her remarks, which were interpreted as grave threats under Philippine law. The law penalizes public statements that threaten harm to individuals or their families with imprisonment and fines.

Duterte, a lawyer and the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, denied that her remarks constituted an actual threat. Instead, she described them as an expression of concern for her safety amidst vague dangers to her life. Calling the Marcos administration’s response a “farce,” she accused it of persecuting her and silencing critics.

Duterte, who resigned from Marcos’s Cabinet in June, said she is willing to cooperate with the investigation but demanded that Marcos address corruption allegations she has raised against his administration.

Marcos Administration’s Reaction

President Marcos characterized Duterte’s comments as criminal and vowed to uphold the rule of law. Security measures around Marcos were immediately intensified, with both the national police and military expressing alarm. National Security Adviser Eduardo Año labeled Duterte’s remarks a national security threat.

The administration also turned its attention to former President Rodrigo Duterte, Sara Duterte’s father, who made controversial comments hinting at military intervention in governance. While he clarified he was not calling for a coup, Duterte claimed that the military is the only institution capable of addressing systemic corruption in civilian government.

Justice Undersecretary Jesse Andres said the elder Duterte’s remarks bordered on sedition, citing his statement about a commander-in-chief being a “drug addict” — an accusation Rodrigo Duterte has often levied against Marcos, which the president has consistently denied.

The Marcos-Duterte Rift

The fallout between Marcos and Duterte reflects a dramatic shift in Philippine politics. The two leaders ran on a platform of unity in the 2022 elections, achieving landslide victories. However, their relationship soured over policy disagreements and governance issues, including approaches to China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea and Rodrigo Duterte’s controversial anti-drug campaign.

Sara Duterte’s resignation as education secretary and head of an anti-insurgency body in June marked a turning point in their alliance. Since then, she has emerged as one of Marcos’s most vocal critics, accusing his administration of corruption and incompetence.

Allegations and Investigations

The tension between the two camps is also fueled by congressional investigations into Duterte’s alleged misuse of confidential funds during her tenure as vice president and education secretary. Duterte denies wrongdoing, claiming the investigations are politically motivated attempts to suppress critics and whistleblowers.

Justice Undersecretary Andres emphasized that the country’s justice system remains fully functional and is equipped to address any allegations of corruption or irregularities raised by Duterte or others.

Rodrigo Duterte’s Role

Former President Rodrigo Duterte’s involvement has added another layer to the controversy. Known for his blunt rhetoric, the elder Duterte’s remarks about military intervention and criticisms of Marcos’s leadership have drawn scrutiny. Andres suggested that investigators are exploring whether the statements by both Dutertes are part of a larger destabilization plot against the Marcos administration.

The Bigger Picture

The feud between Marcos and Duterte illustrates the volatile nature of Philippine politics, where alliances can shift dramatically. Both leaders face challenges in managing their respective political legacies and agendas.

Marcos must navigate accusations of corruption and concerns about governance while maintaining public trust. Meanwhile, Sara Duterte, previously seen as a potential presidential contender, risks legal jeopardy and political marginalization.

The rivalry also raises broader questions about accountability, governance, and the rule of law in the Philippines. As investigations continue, the outcome could significantly impact the country’s political landscape and stability.

More on World News

Philippine VP Sara Philippine VP Sara