Rudy Giuliani Settles Defamation Case with Election Workers

Yesterday at 4:46 pm

1602 posts

Rudy Giuliani Settles Defamation Case with Election Workers \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Rudy Giuliani reached a settlement with two former Georgia election workers to resolve a $148 million defamation case. Giuliani will retain key assets, including homes and personal items, in exchange for compensation and a promise to stop defamatory remarks. Both parties agreed to move forward without disclosing the settlement amount.

Giuliani-Election Workers Settlement: Quick Looks

Settlement Details: Rudy Giuliani resolved the defamation lawsuit with Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, avoiding a trial.
Terms: Giuliani keeps homes and personal belongings in exchange for undisclosed compensation and a no-defamation agreement.
Legal Background: Freeman and Moss sued Giuliani for defamation after false claims about election fraud led to threats.
Judge’s Actions: Giuliani faced contempt for failing to disclose financial details, restricting his evidence rights.
Outcome: The settlement ends a prolonged legal battle, with both sides expressing relief over the resolution.

Deep Look

Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor and attorney for Donald Trump, reached a settlement with Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, two former Georgia election workers, concluding a prolonged legal battle stemming from Giuliani’s unfounded claims of election fraud in the 2020 presidential race. The agreement allows Giuliani to retain key personal assets, including his homes and prized memorabilia, while compensating the women for damages related to the defamation judgment. The settlement comes as Giuliani faces mounting legal, financial, and reputational challenges.

The Case and Its Background

Freeman and Moss filed a defamation lawsuit after enduring years of harassment and death threats triggered by Giuliani’s false accusations that they manipulated votes in Georgia during the 2020 election. Giuliani’s baseless allegations, part of Trump’s broader efforts to contest the election results, painted the women as central figures in an alleged conspiracy to rig the election.

In 2023, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding a $148 million judgment against Giuliani. Freeman and Moss described the impact of the false accusations as a “living nightmare,” saying they feared for their lives as a result of the threats and public backlash. The lawsuit underscored the personal and professional damage inflicted by Giuliani’s statements.

Freeman and Moss stated in their settlement announcement:
“The past four years have been a living nightmare. Today is a major milestone in our journey to restore our reputations and prove we did nothing wrong.”

Settlement Terms: Avoiding a Trial

The trial, originally scheduled to begin Thursday in Manhattan federal court, aimed to determine whether Giuliani would have to surrender valuable assets to satisfy the judgment. However, last-minute negotiations led to a settlement agreement, avoiding further courtroom proceedings.

Key points of the settlement include:

Retention of Assets: Giuliani will retain his New York cooperative apartment, a Florida condominium valued at over $3 million, and personal memorabilia, including three World Series rings gifted by late Yankees owner George Steinbrenner.
Compensation: Giuliani agreed to pay an undisclosed sum as part of the settlement.
Non-Defamation Agreement: Both parties agreed not to make further defamatory statements about each other.

Giuliani’s attorney, Joseph Cammarata, revealed that negotiations had been ongoing for three days and extended late into the night to finalize the deal. Giuliani himself expressed relief, stating:
“This resolution does not involve an admission of liability or wrongdoing. No one deserves to be subjected to threats, harassment, or intimidation. This litigation has taken its toll on all parties.”

Legal Challenges and Financial Struggles

The settlement caps a series of legal setbacks for Giuliani, who has faced growing scrutiny for his role in advancing Trump’s election fraud claims. Giuliani’s financial troubles have also been well-documented, with reports indicating he has surrendered multiple high-value assets, including a $5 million New York apartment and a collection of luxury watches.

During a recent deposition, Giuliani painted a bleak picture of his finances:
“Everything I have is tied up. I don’t have a car, a credit card, or cash. I can’t get to bank accounts that truly would be mine because they have put … stop orders on, for example, my Social Security account.”

Despite these struggles, Giuliani maintained that he is “not impoverished,” estimating his total assets at approximately $10 million. However, legal fees, judgments, and asset freezes have left him with limited access to his wealth.

World Series Rings: A Key Dispute

Among the contested assets were three World Series rings, valued at $27,000, which Giuliani claims were purchased from Steinbrenner in 2002 with the intention of giving them to his son, Andrew Giuliani. Giuliani testified that one ring was immediately handed to Andrew, while the others were kept for safekeeping. As part of the settlement, Andrew will retain the rings, resolving one of the more personal disputes in the case.

Court Proceedings and Contempt Rulings

Leading up to the settlement, Giuliani faced legal challenges on multiple fronts. Manhattan federal court Judge Lewis J. Liman held Giuliani in contempt for failing to provide financial disclosures required by the court. The contempt ruling barred Giuliani from introducing certain evidence to support his case, effectively weakening his position.

Additionally, a Washington, D.C., judge found Giuliani in contempt for continuing to repeat defamatory claims against Freeman and Moss, despite previous rulings against him. These rulings highlighted Giuliani’s legal vulnerabilities and added pressure to resolve the case quickly.

The Plaintiffs’ Perspective

Freeman and Moss framed the settlement as a step toward reclaiming their lives after years of fear and harassment. Their case became a focal point in the broader narrative of election misinformation, illustrating the tangible harm caused by baseless conspiracy theories.

The plaintiffs expressed gratitude for the resolution, stating:
“We have fought to clear our names, restore our reputations, and prove that we did nothing wrong. We can now move forward with our lives.”

Giuliani’s Public Statements

Following the settlement, Giuliani issued a public statement reiterating his stance that the resolution did not constitute an admission of wrongdoing. He emphasized that the litigation had been draining for all parties involved and called for an end to defamatory rhetoric:
“This whole episode was unfortunate. I and the plaintiffs have agreed not to ever talk about each other in any defamatory manner, and I urge others to do the same.”

Broader Implications

The case highlights the legal and personal consequences of spreading election misinformation. Freeman and Moss’ victory underscores the accountability individuals face when amplifying false claims, particularly those with high visibility and influence. For Giuliani, the settlement marks the culmination of one of many legal battles tied to his role in Trump’s post-election efforts.

While the agreement allows Giuliani to retain some of his most valuable assets, it also signals the financial and reputational toll of his involvement in promoting conspiracy theories. As Giuliani navigates these challenges, the case serves as a reminder of the long-term impact of election-related disinformation.