Trump’s 25% Tariffs on Canada and Mexico Begin Saturday \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ President Donald Trump confirmed that 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico will take effect Saturday but said he has yet to decide whether oil from those countries will be included. Trump claimed the U.S. has enough oil and resources to withstand the tariffs, dismissing concerns about economic fallout. Meanwhile, he reiterated that China will face additional tariffs for exporting chemicals used in fentanyl production.
Trump’s Trade Tariffs Take Effect – Quick Looks
- Trump’s 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico start Saturday, but oil imports may or may not be included.
- The White House will decide on oil tariffs soon, based on whether Canada and Mexico’s pricing is “fair.”
- The U.S. imports nearly 5.2 million barrels of oil daily from the two countries, raising concerns about potential price increases.
- Trump insists the U.S. economy won’t suffer, saying the country has “all the oil and lumber it needs.”
- Tariffs are being used as leverage in immigration and fentanyl-related negotiations with Mexico and China.
- China faces additional trade penalties, including a 10% tariff on fentanyl-related chemical exports.
Deep Look: Trump Confirms 25% Tariffs, Leaves Oil Imports in Limbo
In a press conference from the Oval Office, President Trump reaffirmed that the United States will impose 25% tariffs on all imports from Canada and Mexico starting Saturday, following through on a campaign promise to take a tougher stance on trade. However, the question of whether oil imports from these two countries will be included in the new tariffs remains unresolved.
Trump, speaking to reporters, stated that his administration is still evaluating whether oil from Canada and Mexico should be taxed under the new tariffs. The final decision, he said, will come after further consideration of whether the prices set by the two countries are “fair.”
“We may or may not [include oil]. We’re going to make that determination probably tonight.”
This uncertainty has left energy markets, policymakers, and businesses on edge, as Canada and Mexico supply a significant portion of the crude oil consumed in the United States. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the U.S. imported 4.6 million barrels of oil per day from Canada and 563,000 barrels per day from Mexico as recently as October. Meanwhile, U.S. domestic oil production averaged 13.5 million barrels per day during that same period.
Despite warnings from economists and trade analysts that these tariffs could raise costs for American consumers and businesses, Trump brushed off concerns about economic fallout. He insisted that the U.S. is self-sufficient in energy production and resource extraction, making external imports less critical.
“We don’t need the products that they have. We have all the oil you need. We have all the trees you need, meaning the lumber.”
This stance echoes Trump’s broader America-first trade policy, which has prioritized reducing dependence on foreign goods, renegotiating trade deals, and using tariffs as a bargaining tool. However, critics argue that his aggressive use of tariffs could backfire, leading to higher costs for businesses and consumers while fueling trade conflicts with key allies.
Tariffs as a Political Weapon: Immigration and Fentanyl Smuggling
Unlike traditional tariffs, which are typically implemented to protect domestic industries, Trump has framed these new import taxes as a tool to pressure Mexico and Canada on immigration and drug enforcement. He claims that the tariffs are necessary to stop illegal immigration and curb the smuggling of chemicals used in fentanyl production.
This justification has drawn sharp criticism from trade experts and business leaders, who argue that using trade policy as leverage for unrelated political issues could create long-term instability in international markets. The move has also sparked concerns about whether Mexico and Canada might retaliate with their own tariffs on U.S. goods, further escalating trade tensions.
At the same time, Trump has expanded his tariff threats to China, announcing new 10% tariffs on Chinese chemicals used in fentanyl production. The U.S. has long accused Chinese manufacturers of supplying precursor chemicals to Mexican drug cartels, which then process them into fentanyl for distribution in the U.S.
“China is going to pay for what they’re doing,” Trump said, reaffirming his hardline stance on the opioid crisis.
However, some experts question the effectiveness of using tariffs to combat drug trafficking, noting that fentanyl production operates outside formal trade channels and that higher tariffs may not significantly impact illicit supply chains.
Economic Concerns and Potential Fallout
While Trump insists that the U.S. economy will not be harmed by these tariffs, many economists and trade policy analysts disagree. Historically, tariffs have led to higher costs for consumers and disrupted supply chains, particularly when imposed on critical imports such as energy, raw materials, and consumer goods.
If Trump decides to impose tariffs on oil, the consequences could be particularly significant. The United States remains a major consumer of foreign oil, despite increasing domestic production in recent years. Tariffs on Canadian and Mexican oil would likely:
- Drive up gasoline and energy prices, as refiners pass additional costs onto consumers.
- Put pressure on U.S. businesses, especially those reliant on affordable fuel and transportation.
- Strain trade relations with Canada and Mexico, both of whom could retaliate with their own tariffs on U.S. goods.
The risk of economic disruption has led some Republican lawmakers and business leaders to privately urge Trump to reconsider his approach, arguing that a trade war with Canada and Mexico could harm American exporters and drive inflation.
Canada, in particular, has expressed strong opposition to the tariffs, with government officials warning that they will respond with countermeasures if necessary. Mexico has also hinted at potential retaliation, raising fears of a broader trade conflict.
Trump’s Gamble: Strength or Overreach?
Trump’s decision to escalate tariffs on key trading partners reflects his belief that aggressive economic measures will strengthen U.S. bargaining power on the world stage. His administration has frequently used tariffs as a negotiating tool, as seen in previous trade disputes with China and Europe.
However, this strategy carries substantial risks. While it may force Canada and Mexico to engage in new trade discussions, it could also alienate two of America’s closest economic allies, create higher costs for U.S. businesses, and fuel economic uncertainty at home.
Moreover, Trump’s framing of tariffs as a solution to immigration and drug smuggling has raised legal and strategic questions. Many experts argue that tariffs are not an effective tool for addressing border security or drug trafficking, and some fear that tying economic policy to political disputes could set a dangerous precedent.
What Happens Next?
With Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico set to take effect on Saturday, the next major decision will be whether oil imports are included. A final announcement is expected within hours, and the reaction from business leaders, trade partners, and lawmakers will be closely watched.
In the coming weeks, attention will also turn to:
- How Canada and Mexico respond—whether they seek negotiations, impose retaliatory tariffs, or escalate tensions.
- The impact on gas prices and consumer goods, as businesses adjust to higher import costs.
- Trump’s ongoing tariff threats against China, and whether additional penalties on fentanyl-related chemicals will be enforced.
As Trump doubles down on his America-first trade agenda, the stakes are high for the U.S. economy, international trade relations, and domestic political stability. Whether his tariff strategy proves to be a bold negotiating move or a costly miscalculation remains to be seen.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.