NCAA Settles NIL Lawsuit with Tennessee, Virginia, and Others

NCAA Settles NIL Lawsuit with Tennessee, Virginia, and Others \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ The NCAA has reached a settlement with Tennessee, Virginia, and other states over its ban on name, image, and likeness (NIL) compensation for college recruits. The agreement, filed in U.S. District Court in Tennessee, is expected to be finalized by March 17. Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti says the deal ensures athletes’ NIL rights while preventing the NCAA from reviving NIL recruiting restrictions.

NCAA NIL Lawsuit Settlement: Quick Look

• NCAA Settles NIL Lawsuit: The NCAA reached a settlement with Tennessee, Virginia, and other states over its ban on NIL compensation for recruits.
• Settlement Finalized by March 17: The agreement was filed in U.S. District Court, with full details expected later in the spring.
• NCAA Can’t Reinstate NIL Ban: Tennessee AG Jonathan Skrmetti confirmed the NCAA is permanently prohibited from reviving NIL recruiting restrictions.
• Lawsuit Stemmed from Tennessee Probe: The case was filed after the NCAA investigated Tennessee for NIL-related recruiting violations.
• Court Rulings Weakened NCAA Authority: A judge previously blocked the NIL recruiting ban, calling it anticompetitive and unlawful.
• Tied to Larger NCAA Legal Battles: The settlement comes amid the $2.8 billion House settlement, which could reshape athlete compensation in college sports.
• What’s Next? The NCAA must finalize the agreement by March 17, while facing additional lawsuits over NIL and athlete compensation.

Deep Look

Major Legal Victory for College Athletes’ NIL Rights

The NCAA has agreed to a settlement with the attorneys general of Tennessee, Virginia, and several other states over its prohibition on NIL compensation for college recruits. The deal, announced Friday, follows a lawsuit filed a year ago challenging the NCAA’s restrictions on third-party payments to student-athletes during the recruiting process.

According to a court filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, the settlement has been agreed upon in principle, with the final agreement and a request for a permanent injunction expected by March 17.

What the Settlement Means for NIL and Recruiting

The lawsuit, filed by Tennessee and Virginia and later joined by New York, Florida, and Washington, D.C., argued that the NCAA’s rules unfairly restricted athletes from benefiting financially during recruitment. The NCAA’s longstanding amateurism model prohibited third parties from paying recruits to attend a specific school, but this lawsuit successfully challenged that principle under antitrust law.

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti celebrated the outcome, stating that the agreement prevents the NCAA from reinstating its NIL recruiting ban and protects athletes’ rights.

“Now this settlement in principle lays the groundwork for a permanent solution,” Skrmetti said.

How the Lawsuit Unfolded

The case stemmed from the NCAA’s investigation of the University of Tennessee over possible NIL-related recruiting violations. The lawsuit, filed on January 31, 2023, claimed that the NCAA’s NIL rules violated the Sherman Antitrust Act and unfairly harmed student-athletes and schools.

Last February, U.S. District Judge Clifton Corker dealt a major blow to the NCAA by issuing a preliminary injunction, preventing the organization from enforcing NIL recruiting restrictions while the lawsuit proceeded. Corker’s decision undermined one of the NCAA’s core principles—that third parties should not be able to pay athletes to commit to a school.

The ruling marked yet another challenge to the NCAA’s authority over college sports governance, impacting over 500,000 athletes nationwide.

NCAA’s Response and Path Forward

The NCAA initially requested an extension before filing a response on January 20, 2024. A status conference was scheduled for January 23, but the settlement was reached before further proceedings took place.

In a statement Friday, the NCAA said:

“The NCAA has reached a settlement that resolves the issues Tennessee and the other involved states raised without posing an obstacle to completing the House, Carter, and Hubbard settlements. We anticipate full terms will be released later in the spring.”

The House settlement, a separate $2.8 billion antitrust case involving the NCAA and major conferences, has also faced legal scrutiny. The deadline for objections to that settlement was also Friday, signaling a critical moment for college athletics governance and NIL policies.

University of Tennessee’s Role in the Legal Battle

The lawsuit against the NCAA was filed just one day after University of Tennessee Chancellor Donde Plowman criticized the NCAA for its investigation into Tennessee’s NIL practices.

At the time, Tennessee’s NIL system involved booster-funded organizations that provided student-athletes with financial opportunities. The NCAA’s crackdown on Tennessee prompted state officials to take legal action, arguing that the rules unfairly restricted economic opportunities for student-athletes.

Ongoing Legal Challenges for the NCAA

The NCAA continues to face legal pressure beyond this NIL case. The House settlement, which proposes billions in back pay to former athletes and gives schools the option to distribute up to $20.5 million per year in NIL payments, is also being contested by various parties.

Some concerns about the House settlement include:

• Potential Title IX conflicts, as some fear female athletes may receive less compensation.
• Roster limits and salary cap concerns, as schools struggle to balance athlete payments with budgets.

With Friday’s deadline for objections passed, the next few months could reshape how NIL is handled at the collegiate level.

What Happens Next?

With the March 17 deadline approaching for finalizing the NIL settlement, the NCAA must comply with the terms agreed upon with the states. While the full details of the settlement will be released later this spring, key takeaways include:

1. The NCAA is permanently prohibited from reviving its NIL recruiting ban.
2. Athletes will continue to have the right to receive NIL compensation during recruitment.
3. Colleges and universities will have greater flexibility in NIL arrangements without fear of NCAA punishment.

The fallout from this lawsuit could inspire further challenges to the NCAA’s rules, as states and universities push for more athlete rights.

With ongoing legal battles and mounting pressure from lawmakers, the NCAA faces an uncertain future in its ability to govern college sports.

More on Sports

NCAA Settles NCAA Settles