Pentagon on Edge as Hegseth Removes Senior Military Leaders

Pentagon on Edge as Hegseth Removes Senior Military Leaders \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has removed the top legal officers of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, stating they were “not well-suited” to provide recommendations on lawful orders. The firings follow President Donald Trump’s abrupt removal of Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. CQ Brown Jr., as well as other senior military officials, raising concerns about political influence in the Pentagon. Hegseth, who has vowed to purge diversity-focused leadership, insists the changes are based on meritocracy, but unease is spreading among military personnel over the lack of clear reasoning behind the firings.

Trump’s Military Shakeup: Quick Looks

• Hegseth Fires Top Military Lawyers: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth removed the Judge Advocate Generals (JAGs) for the Army, Navy, and Air Force, citing concerns over their ability to provide legal recommendations.
• Pentagon Leadership Overhaul: The firings come just days after Trump dismissed Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. CQ Brown Jr., along with Navy Chief Adm. Lisa Franchetti and Air Force Vice Chief Gen. James Slife.
• Legal Concerns Over Joint Chiefs Pick: Trump’s choice for Joint Chiefs chairman, retired Lt. Gen. Dan Caine, does not meet legal requirements for the role, but the president may waive those rules.
• Meritocracy or Ideological Purge? Hegseth claims military leadership changes are based on merit, but critics worry diversity-focused officers are being targeted.
• Pentagon Personnel On Edge: With no clear explanation for the firings, military leaders and civilian staff fear more removals could be coming.
• Musk’s Federal Employee Review Adds Uncertainty: At the same time, Elon Musk’s demand for federal employees to justify their jobs by Monday has created further unease.
• What’s Next? The Pentagon awaits nominations for new JAG officers, while Congress and military officials closely watch further changes in Trump’s defense leadership team.

Deep Look

The Pentagon is reeling from a wave of high-profile removals, as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the firing of top legal officers in the Army, Navy, and Air Force, continuing a broader shakeup of military leadership under President Donald Trump.

The removals follow Trump’s firing of Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. CQ Brown Jr. last Friday, an unprecedented move that has fueled uncertainty about the future of military leadership. Hegseth, who has openly questioned Brown’s qualifications, defended Trump’s decision, arguing that the president has the right to select his own team.

Now, with senior legal officers also ousted, concerns are growing over whether these firings are politically motivated, part of a larger ideological purge, or intended to reshape the military under Trump’s vision.

Why Were Military Lawyers Fired?

Hegseth said Monday that the top legal officers for the military services—known as Judge Advocate Generals (JAGs)—were removed because they were not “well-suited” to provide legal recommendations.

However, he did not specify what made them unfit for their roles, leaving Pentagon officials and legal experts questioning the motivation behind their sudden dismissal.

Among those fired were:

• Lt. Gen. Joseph B. Berger III – Army JAG
• Lt. Gen. Charles Plummer – Air Force JAG
• A still-unidentified Navy JAG replacement (Vice Adm. Christopher French retired months ago, and his replacement had not yet been named)

The firings come as part of a broader restructuring, with Hegseth “requesting nominations” for their replacements.

Trump’s Military Shakeup: Who’s Been Removed?

The removal of senior JAG officers comes days after Trump fired:

• Gen. CQ Brown Jr. – Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
• Adm. Lisa Franchetti – Chief of Naval Operations
• Gen. James Slife – Vice Chief of the Air Force

Hegseth’s Defense: “Meritocracy” or Ideological Purge?

Hegseth has argued that military leadership should be based on merit, but the lack of clear criteria for the dismissals has fueled speculation that these moves are politically or ideologically driven.

The Pentagon remains on edge, with many uncertain whether the firings are due to performance issues, policy disagreements, or even race and gender considerations.

Hegseth’s previous statements have intensified speculation. Before taking over as Defense Secretary, he:

• Questioned whether Gen. Brown got the Joint Chiefs job because of his race
• Vowed to eliminate military leadership that promotes diversity and inclusion efforts
• Criticized “woke” policies in the military, claiming they weaken readiness

Given this background, some see the firings as part of a broader campaign to reshape military leadership based on Trump and Hegseth’s ideological views on diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Trump’s Controversial Joint Chiefs Pick Raises More Questions

Adding to the uncertainty surrounding military leadership, Trump’s choice for the next Joint Chiefs chairman, retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Dan Caine, does not meet the legal qualifications for the job.

According to U.S. law, the chairman must have served as a combatant commander or service chief, neither of which applies to Caine. However, Trump can waive this requirement, as has been done in rare cases in the past.

Despite legal concerns, the administration has not publicly addressed why it bypassed more traditionally qualified candidates.

Pentagon Personnel Juggle National Security Duties With Job Uncertainty

As the Trump administration’s restructuring of the Pentagon continues, military and civilian personnel are increasingly uncertain about their own job security.

Adding to the unease, Elon Musk’s demand that federal employees submit proof of recent accomplishments by Monday or risk termination has further disrupted operations.

Although government officials later clarified that Musk’s order was “voluntary,” the mixed messaging has left many employees unsure about their standing.

With top-ranking officers being fired without detailed explanations, military leaders across the Pentagon are left to wonder who might be next.

What’s Next for the Pentagon?

• Trump and Hegseth will continue restructuring military leadership, possibly replacing more high-ranking officers in the coming weeks.
• Congress may scrutinize the firings, particularly the removal of legally appointed service leaders without a clear rationale.
• The nomination process for new JAG officers will be closely watched, as the administration selects replacements aligned with its policies.
• Legal challenges could arise over whether the firing of Brown, Franchetti, Slife, and others followed proper protocol.

As the Biden-era military leadership is rapidly dismantled, the Pentagon faces growing uncertainty over how this transition will impact U.S. defense strategy.

The coming weeks will determine whether Trump’s new military appointments align with traditional defense policies or represent a deeper ideological shift in the direction of America’s armed forces.

More on US News

Pentagon on Edge