NewsTop Storyus elections

ABC Moderators Fact-Check Trump, Navigate Tense Debate with Harris

ABC Anchor David Muir

Trump Harris debate/ ABC moderators debate/ Trump fact-checked debate/ Kamala Harris debate response/ Trump debate performance/ Newslooks/ Pennsylvania/ The ABC News moderators faced a tough task during the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, navigating fact-checking duties in a polarized political climate. David Muir and Linsey Davis corrected Trump multiple times on issues like abortion and crime, leading to criticism from his supporters. Both candidates avoided answering some key questions, and reactions to the moderators’ performance were heavily split along party lines.

People watch the presidential debate between Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, at the Gipsy Las Vegas in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/John Locher)

ABC Moderators Grapple with Debate: Quick Looks

  • Moderator Fact-Checks: ABC’s David Muir and Linsey Davis corrected Trump on abortion, the 2020 election, and other claims during the debate.
  • Trump’s Response: After the debate, Trump criticized the moderators, calling the event a “three-on-one” attack.
  • Polarized Reactions: Conservatives, like Megyn Kelly, slammed the moderators, while liberal commentators praised their handling of Trump’s misstatements.
  • Candidate Tensions: Both Trump and Kamala Harris dodged key questions, including Trump’s stance on Ukraine and Harris’s Justice Department responses.
  • Body Language: Trump appeared agitated at several points, while Harris often reacted with bemusement and disbelief.

ABC Moderators Fact-Check Trump, Navigate Tense Debate with Harris

Deep Look:

The ABC News moderators faced significant challenges during the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, illustrating the difficulty of navigating a presidential debate in such a polarized country. Moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis found themselves fact-checking Trump on several occasions, leading to harsh criticism from Trump and his supporters. This reaction underscored how any attempt to conduct a balanced debate is increasingly seen through a partisan lens.

ABC Moderators Face Immediate Backlash

Moments after the debate concluded, Trump took to his Truth Social platform, expressing frustration with the moderators. “I thought that was my best debate, EVER, especially since it was THREE ON ONE!” he posted, highlighting the adversarial tone he felt during the event.

Throughout the debate, Trump was fact-checked on several issues, including abortion, the 2020 election, and immigration. When Trump repeated his false claim that Democrats support killing babies after they are born, Linsey Davis stepped in, noting, “There is no state in the country where it is legal to kill a baby after it was born.”

Trump also faced pushback from David Muir when he claimed that violent crime had risen under President Joe Biden’s administration. Muir countered with statistics, pointing out that violent crime had decreased during that period. Trump’s frustration with these corrections was evident, as he often interrupted to defend himself or shift the topic.

Meanwhile, ABC moderators did not fact-check Kamala Harris during the debate. Harris stuck to familiar talking points and faced less scrutiny, something that conservative commentators were quick to pounce on.

Polarized Reactions to ABC Moderators

Reactions to how ABC News handled the debate were deeply divided. MSNBC commentator Chris Hayes praised the moderators, tweeting that they did an “excellent” job. On the opposite side, Ben Shapiro, a conservative commentator, derided Hayes’ take, signaling dissatisfaction with how ABC approached the debate.

Conservative media personalities like Megyn Kelly went further in their criticism, calling the moderators a “disgraceful failure” on social media. “Shame on ABC,” Kelly posted, decrying what she saw as bias toward Harris.

By contrast, liberal commentators praised the moderators’ approach. Atlantic writer James Surowiecki wrote that ABC allowed Trump to “hang himself” with his off-the-cuff remarks, referring to Trump’s long-winded, often unfocused responses.

CNN’s Jake Tapper echoed that sentiment, commenting after the debate, “It was like a 4Chan post come to life.” Tapper’s comments reflected the view that Trump’s performance veered into conspiracy theories and extreme rhetoric, particularly when he repeated false claims about immigrants in Ohio eating pets.

Candidates Dodge Key Questions

Despite the heated exchanges, both candidates avoided answering specific questions. Kamala Harris sidestepped a question about Trump’s accusation that the Justice Department had been weaponized against him. She also avoided fully addressing her shift on progressive issues, choosing instead to focus on the broader theme of protecting democracy.

Trump similarly dodged direct answers about his stance on the Russia-Ukraine war, even when pressed twice by Muir to clarify whether he wanted Ukraine to win. Instead, Trump pivoted to his longstanding grievances about NATO and U.S. foreign policy.

Body Language and Debate Atmosphere

The split-screen shots of the candidates throughout the night revealed a striking contrast in demeanor. Donald Trump, often stone-faced, appeared visibly irritated as Harris needled him on issues like abortion and the 2020 election. He frequently avoided eye contact with Harris, focusing instead on the moderators or the cameras.

Harris, on the other hand, displayed a range of reactions — from bemusement to open amusement — as Trump spoke. She often shook her head or smiled in disbelief, especially when Trump raised conspiracy theories about immigrants or tried to tie her to Biden’s perceived failures.

A Tough Night for Moderators

Conducting a presidential debate in such a polarized political environment proved to be an almost impossible task. Despite their best efforts, the ABC moderators found themselves caught in the crossfire, with both sides picking apart their performance based on their own political biases.

As fact-checking became a central element of the evening, some praised Muir and Davis for their efforts, while others argued that they were too focused on challenging Trump without holding Harris equally accountable.

In a post-debate analysis, Brit Hume of Fox News noted that while Harris was not “held to the fire” during the debate, the real takeaway was Trump’s inability to effectively respond to her attacks. “Make no mistake about it,” Hume said, “Trump had a bad night.”

Read more U.S. news


Previous Article
Kamala Harris Shines in Debate, Outpacing Biden’s Earlier Performance
Next Article
U.S. Honors 9/11 Victims Amid Presidential Campaign Politics

How useful was this article?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this article.

Latest News

Menu