Apple tax appeal/ Apple Ireland tax case/ EU Apple ruling/ Apple back taxes/ Newslooks/ LONDON/ The European Union’s top court dismissed Apple’s final appeal, requiring the company to pay Ireland 13 billion euros in back taxes. The decision upholds a 2016 EU ruling that deemed Apple’s tax deal with Ireland unlawful, ending a long legal battle.
Apple Loses Final Appeal in EU Tax Case: Quick Looks
- Court Ruling: EU’s top court dismisses Apple’s final appeal on a $13 billion tax order.
- Back Taxes: Apple must repay 13 billion euros to Ireland for unlawful tax benefits.
- 2016 Decision Upheld: The ruling supports the European Commission’s original decision against Apple.
- Apple’s Response: The company denies any special tax deal and expresses disappointment.
- Historical Context: The case highlights the EU’s broader efforts to hold U.S. tech companies accountable for tax compliance.
Apple Loses Final EU Appeal in $13B Tax Dispute
Deep Look
The European Union’s top court dealt a final blow to Apple on Tuesday, rejecting the company’s last appeal in a years-long legal battle over 13 billion euros ($14 billion) in back taxes owed to Ireland. This ruling puts an end to one of the EU’s most high-profile tax disputes, confirming the European Commission’s 2016 decision that Apple had received unlawful state aid from Ireland through favorable tax deals.
The European Court of Justice upheld the Commission’s claim that Ireland granted Apple tax benefits that allowed the company to pay significantly lower tax rates on its European profits. According to the EU’s executive body, Apple’s effective tax rate dropped from 1 percent in 2003 to just 0.005 percent in 2014 on its European earnings.
The ruling reverses a 2020 decision by the EU’s General Court, which had initially sided with Apple, annulling the European Commission’s findings. In response to the latest decision, Apple expressed disappointment, stating: “We are disappointed with today’s decision as previously the General Court reviewed the facts and categorically annulled this case.” The company reiterated its stance that “there has never been a special deal” with Irish authorities.
The case first emerged in 2016, when the European Commission, led by Margrethe Vestager, accused Apple of benefiting from illegal tax arrangements. At the time, Apple CEO Tim Cook condemned the decision, calling it “total political crap,” while then-U.S. President Donald Trump criticized Vestager, referring to her as the “tax lady” who “really hates the U.S.”
The tax dispute centered on the European Union’s rules against state aid, which prohibit member countries from giving companies selective financial advantages that distort competition. The European Commission argued that Ireland’s tax treatment of Apple amounted to such illegal aid, effectively allowing Apple to pay little to no taxes on profits generated across Europe for over a decade.
Ireland, which had sided with Apple in the case, must now recover the 13 billion euros, although it has previously expressed reluctance to do so. Irish authorities had maintained that Apple’s tax arrangements were compliant with both Irish and EU law at the time.
The legal battle has been a significant flashpoint in the broader debate over whether multinational corporations—particularly U.S. tech giants like Apple, Google, and Amazon—are paying their fair share of taxes globally. The European Union has been at the forefront of pushing for more aggressive enforcement of tax laws, competition rules, and privacy regulations to hold these companies accountable.
Apple has repeatedly disputed the tax figures presented by the European Commission, but the court’s ruling underscores the EU’s determination to ensure that multinational corporations cannot exploit favorable tax schemes to minimize their tax liabilities across the bloc.
This ruling is part of a wider effort by the European Union to address tax avoidance and ensure fair competition, especially among large corporations. The outcome of this case reinforces the EU’s authority in overseeing the business practices of multinational firms and curbing tax avoidance practices within its member states.
