A Vatican tribunal on Saturday convicted a cardinal of embezzlement and sentenced him to 5 ½ years in prison in one of several verdicts handed down in a complicated financial trial that aired the city state’s dirty laundry and tested its justice system. Cardinal Angelo Becciu, the first cardinal ever prosecuted by the Vatican criminal court, was absolved of several other charges and nine other defendants received a combination of guilty verdicts and acquittals among the nearly 50 charges brought against them during a 2 ½ year trial.
Quick Read
- Cardinal Becciu Convicted: Cardinal Angelo Becciu was convicted of embezzlement and sentenced to 5 ½ years in prison. This marks the first time a cardinal has been prosecuted by the Vatican criminal court.
- Mixed Verdicts for Defendants: Among the nine other defendants, there were a combination of guilty verdicts and acquittals for the nearly 50 charges brought against them during the 2 ½ year trial.
- Becciu’s Charges and Conviction: Becciu was accused of embezzlement-related charges linked to the Vatican’s investment in a London property and a donation to a charity run by his brother. He was convicted for the original investment and the donation.
- Prosecution’s Reaction: Prosecutor Alessandro Diddi viewed the verdict as a confirmation of their stance, while Becciu’s lawyer announced plans to appeal.
- Trial’s Focus: The trial centered on a 350 million euro investment by the Vatican secretariat of state in a London property, with allegations of financial mismanagement and extortion.
- Questions on Vatican’s Legal System: The trial raised questions about the rule of law in the Vatican and the influence of Pope Francis as the absolute monarch.
- Criticisms of Vatican’s Legal Procedures: Defense attorneys criticized the Vatican’s outdated procedural norms, claiming they favored the prosecution.
- Reputational Impact on the Vatican: The trial exposed internal conflicts and questionable practices within the Vatican, damaging its reputation.
- Financial Claims and Convictions: Prosecutors had sought to recover an estimated 200 million euros lost in bad deals. The tribunal ordered the confiscation of 166 million euros from the defendants and payment of civil damages to Vatican offices.
- Gianluigi Torzi’s Conviction: Gianluigi Torzi, another key figure in the trial, was convicted of several charges, including extortion, and sentenced to six years in prison.
- Uncertainty About Prison Terms: It remains unclear where the convicted individuals will serve their sentences, with the Vatican having its own jail but the whereabouts of some defendants unknown.
- Complexities of the Case: The case involved intricate financial dealings, charity work, and alleged misuse of Vatican funds, reflecting the complexity of Vatican finances and governance.
The Associated Press has the story:
Cardinal is convicted of embezzlement in big Vatican financial trial, sentenced to 5½ years
Newslooks- VATICAN CITY (AP)
A Vatican tribunal on Saturday convicted a cardinal of embezzlement and sentenced him to 5 ½ years in prison in one of several verdicts handed down in a complicated financial trial that aired the city state’s dirty laundry and tested its justice system.
Cardinal Angelo Becciu, the first cardinal ever prosecuted by the Vatican criminal court, was absolved of several other charges and nine other defendants received a combination of guilty verdicts and acquittals among the nearly 50 charges brought against them during a 2 ½ year trial.
Becciu’s lawyer, Fabio Viglione, said he respected the sentence but would appeal.
Prosecutor Alessandro Diddi said the outcome “showed we were correct.”
The trial focused on the Vatican secretariat of state’s 350 million euro investment in developing a former Harrod’s warehouse into luxury apartments. Prosecutors alleged Vatican monsignors and brokers fleeced the Holy See of tens of millions of euros in fees and commissions and then extorted the Holy See for 15 million euros to cede control of the building.
Becciu, the first-ever cardinal to be prosecuted in the Vatican’s criminal court, was accused of embezzlement-related charges in two tangents of the London deal and faced up to seven years in prison.
In the end, he was convicted of embezzlement stemming from the original investment of 200 million euros in a fund that bought into the London property, as well as for his 125,000 euro donation of Vatican money to a charity run by his brother in Sardinia. He was also convicted of using Vatican money to pay an intelligence analyst who in turn was convicted of using the money for herself.
The trial had raised questions about the rule of law in the city state and Francis’ power as absolute monarch, given that he wields supreme legislative, executive and judicial authority and had exercised it in ways the defense says jeopardized a fair trial.
The defense attorneys did praise Judge Giuseppe Pignatone’s even-handedness and said they were able to present their arguments amply. But they lamented the Vatican’s outdated procedural norms gave prosecutors enormous leeway to withhold evidence and otherwise pursue their investigation nearly unimpeded.
Prosecutors had sought prison terms from three to 13 years and damages of over 400 million euros to try to recover the estimated 200 million euros they say the Holy See lost in the bad deals.
In the end, the tribunal acquitted many of the suspects of many of the charges but ordered the confiscation of 166 million euros from them and payment of civil damages to Vatican offices of 200 million euros. One defendant, Becciu’s former secretary Monsignor Mauro Carlino, was acquitted entirely.
The trial was initially seen as a sign of Francis’ financial reforms and willingness to crack down on alleged financial misdeeds in the Vatican. But it had something of a reputational boomerang for the Holy See, with revelations of vendettas, espionage and even ransom payments to Islamic militants.
The secretariat of state, for example, sought damages to fund a marketing campaign to try to repair the reputational harm it says it incurred. Even the Vatican communications department said the trial itself had been a “stress test” for the legal system.
Much of the London case rested on the passage of the property from one London broker to another in late 2018. Prosecutors allege the second broker, Gianluigi Torzi, hoodwinked the Vatican by maneuvering to secure full control of the building that he relinquished only when the Vatican paid him off 15 million euros.
For Vatican prosecutors, that amounted to extortion. For the defense — and a British judge who rejected Vatican requests to seize Torzi’s assets — it was a negotiated exit from a legally binding contract.
In the end, the tribunal convicted Torzi of several charges, including extortion, and sentenced him to six years in prison.
It wasn’t clear where the suspects would serve their time. The Vatican has a jail, but Torzi’s whereabouts weren’t immediately known.
The original London investigation spawned two other tangents that involved the star defendant, Becciu, once one of Francis’ top advisers and himself considered a papal contender.
Prosecutors accused Becciu of embezzlement for sending 125,000 euros in Vatican money to a Sardinian charity run by his brother. Becciu argued that the local bishop requested the money to build a bakery to employ at-risk youths and that the money remained in the diocesan coffers.
The tribunal acknowledged the charitable ends of the donation but convicted him of embezzlement, given his brother’s role.
Becciu was also accused of paying a Sardinian woman, Cecilia Marogna, for her intelligence services. Prosecutors traced some 575,000 euros in wire transfers from the Vatican to a Slovenian front company owned by Marogna and said she used the money to buy luxury goods and fund vacations.
Becciu said he thought the money was going to pay a British security firm to negotiate the release of Gloria Narvaez, a Colombian nun taken hostage by Islamic militants in Mali in 2017.
He said Francis authorized up to 1 million euros to liberate the nun, an astonishing claim that the Vatican was willing to make ransom payment to al-Qaida-linked militants.
The tribunal found both Becciu and Marogna guilty and sentenced Marogna to three years and 9 months in prison.
