Columbia Interim President Katrina Armstrong Resigns Role

Columbia Interim President Katrina Armstrong Resigns Role \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Katrina Armstrong has stepped down as Columbia University’s interim president and returned to her previous role as head of its medical center. Her departure follows recent federal-mandated policy changes tied to restoring $400 million in government funding. The university named trustee Claire Shipman as acting president.

Columbia University Leadership Changes: Quick Looks

• Interim president Katrina Armstrong resigns, returns to lead medical center
• Armstrong’s exit follows compliance with Trump administration funding conditions
• University regained $400M in federal aid after agreeing to policy reforms
• Armstrong had stepped in after Minouche Shafik’s resignation over campus unrest
• Claire Shipman, trustee co-chair, named acting president during leadership search

Deep Look

Columbia University, long regarded as one of the premier institutions in American higher education, has once again entered a period of leadership transition and political scrutiny. On Friday, Dr. Katrina Armstrong, who had been serving as interim president, formally stepped down and will return to her previous role as Chief Executive Officer of Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Dean of the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.

The move comes just days after Columbia agreed to sweeping policy changes mandated by the Trump administration in exchange for the reinstatement of $400 million in federal funding. While Armstrong stated that her return to Columbia’s medical arm was long planned, the timing and political context surrounding her departure point to the broader tensions gripping both the university and the nation’s academic landscape.

A Brief but Crucial Tenure in a Pivotal Moment

Armstrong, a physician and medical executive with a national reputation in public health leadership, took the reins after former President Minouche Shafik resigned earlier this year. Shafik’s departure was prompted by intense backlash over her handling of student protests and campus disputes related to the Israel-Hamas war, which inflamed deep divisions at Columbia and other elite universities.

In stepping into the interim presidency, Armstrong became the face of an administration seeking to stabilize the university amid political scrutiny, donor backlash, and public outrage. Her role was widely viewed as a bridge between medical leadership and broader university governance, and she was expected to provide steady oversight during a politically volatile transition.

But her leadership became even more complex as federal funding for Columbia was suspended—and later restored—after the Trump administration demanded strict compliance with new education policy reforms tied to speech regulation, foreign influence transparency, and campus discipline.

Federal Funding Reinstated—With Conditions

Armstrong’s resignation followed Columbia’s concession to a series of federal demands that included:

• Revised disciplinary procedures for student protests and campus disruptions
• New guidelines on faculty political speech and affiliations
• Audits of foreign funding and external partnerships
• Expanded oversight of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives
• Increased federal involvement in setting policy conditions for future aid

Though Columbia has not publicly disclosed the full terms, insiders say the university’s willingness to adopt these measures was a pragmatic move to recover nearly half a billion dollars in research and infrastructure funding that had been frozen.

The decision to comply has been met with mixed reactions. Some trustees and faculty see it as necessary to preserve Columbia’s financial and academic standing, while others worry it sets a dangerous precedent for how universities may be forced to submit to political pressure in the future.

Armstrong’s Return to Medicine

In her official statement, Armstrong emphasized that her return to Columbia’s medical campus was planned from the beginning of her interim tenure. However, sources close to the university say the timing was influenced by increasing demands placed on the university president in a politically charged environment, where both student groups and federal authorities are scrutinizing every move.

“As I planned when I took on this interim position, and with the support of the Board of Trustees, I am returning to my role as CEO of the Columbia University Irving Medical Center,” Armstrong said.

Armstrong’s medical leadership has been widely praised, and her return is expected to bring continuity to Columbia’s vast health sciences infrastructure, which includes top-ranked programs in biomedical research, public health, and clinical care. She has also led several key initiatives related to health equity and pandemic preparedness.

New Acting President Appointed: Claire Shipman

With Armstrong’s departure, Columbia’s Board of Trustees appointed Claire Shipman—a veteran journalist and current board co-chair—as acting president. Shipman, a former ABC News and CNN correspondent, brings a high-profile media background and deep connections within the university community. Her leadership is expected to focus on damage control, donor reassurance, and the ongoing presidential search.

Shipman’s appointment signals a desire by trustees to stabilize the university’s public image and to navigate continued political scrutiny. Her experience in national media may prove critical as Columbia faces ongoing investigations and policy oversight from Washington.

A Broader Crisis in Higher Education Governance

Columbia’s latest leadership change is part of a larger reckoning in higher education, as elite universities across the U.S. face escalating pressure from lawmakers, donors, and advocacy groups. In recent months:

• The presidents of Harvard and UPenn have also resigned
• Congress has held hearings on campus antisemitism, political bias, and foreign influence
• State legislatures have begun reviewing public university DEI budgets and academic freedom standards
• Federal agencies are increasingly tying financial aid to policy compliance

For Columbia, this moment is more than a leadership shift—it’s a test of how universities can maintain intellectual independence and uphold institutional values while navigating a minefield of political demands.

What Comes Next?

The search for a permanent president will now move forward under intense public scrutiny. The next leader will be expected to balance financial stability, academic freedom, and cultural transformation, all while managing a growing divide between free expression and institutional control.

Armstrong’s departure marks the end of one chapter—but perhaps also a critical turning point for Columbia. The question is whether it can emerge from this turbulence stronger, more transparent, and more unified, or whether the fractures exposed in recent years will continue to deepen.

More on US News