The European court declined because Gareth Lee he never tried to rectify the problem first, and assuming that the characters from Sesame Street are gay, could lead to legal troubles for himand the court if they ruled in his favor. Britain’s Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that the bakery’s refusal to make the cake Lee ordered did not amount to discrimination. As reported by the AP:
He originally ordered the cake to support a campaign to allow same-sex marriage in Northern Ireland
LONDON (AP) — A top European court declined Thursday to rule in a high-profile discrimination case centered on an activist’s request to have a cake decorated with the “Sesame Street” characters Bert and Ernie and the words “Support Gay Marriage.”
The European Court of Human Rights said the case was inadmissible because activist Gareth Lee had failed to “exhaust domestic remedies” in his case against a Northern Ireland bakery.
It was the latest ruling in a long-running legal battle that began in 2014 when Ashers Baking Co. refused to make the cake Lee wanted.
The owners argued they were happy to bake goods for anyone but would not put messages on their products at odds with their Christian beliefs.
Lee said he was frustrated the case was thrown out on what he called “a technicality” and said that freedom of expression “must equally apply to lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people.”
He originally ordered the cake to support a campaign to allow same-sex marriage in Northern Ireland. The campaign succeeded when Britain’s Parliament stepped in to bring the region into line with the rest of the country. Two women who tied the knot in February 2020 became the first gay couple to wed in Northern Ireland.
Britain’s Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that the bakery’s refusal to make the cake Lee ordered did not amount to discrimination, reversing a lower court’s ruling.
Lee then took his case to the Strasbourg, France-based human rights court, arguing that the U.K. Supreme Court decision breached the European Convention on Human Rights.
In a written ruling, the rights court said it could not rule because Lee had not raised the convention in his U.K. court actions.
“Because he had failed to exhaust domestic remedies, the application was inadmissible,” the Court of Human Rights said.
LGBTQ support group the Rainbow Project called the ruling disappointing.
“When a commercial business is providing services to the public, they cannot discriminate against their customers or clients on any grounds protected by equality law,” John O’Doherty, the group’s director, said.
He said the 2018 U.K. Supreme Court ruling created legal uncertainty throughout the country.
“Unfortunately, with today’s decision, that uncertainty will remain,” he said.
The Christian Institute, which had backed the legal fight of the McArthur family that runs Ashers Baking Co., welcomed the ruling, which a spokesman called “good news for free speech, good news for Christians, and good news for the McArthurs.”
“The UK Supreme Court engaged at length with the human rights arguments in this case and upheld the McArthurs’ rights to freedom of expression and religion,” spokesman Simon Calvert said.”
Source AP
