Ex-Defense Chiefs Demand Hearings on Trump’s Military Firings

Ex-Defense Chiefs Demand Hearings on Trump’s Military Firings \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Five former secretaries of defense are urging Congress to hold hearings on President Donald Trump’s recent firings of top military officials, including Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. CQ Brown Jr. The bipartisan group argues the dismissals politicize the military and weaken legal constraints on presidential power. Their letter demands transparency and urges senators to block new Pentagon appointments until an investigation is conducted.

Trump’s Military Firings: Quick Looks

• Bipartisan Concern: Five former defense secretaries called for congressional hearings into Trump’s military shake-up.
• Key Dismissals: Trump fired Gen. CQ Brown Jr., Adm. Lisa Franchetti, Gen. Jim Slife, and military legal heads (JAGs).
• Ex-Officials Warn of Politicization: The firings remove legal constraints on presidential power, the letter claims.
• Hegseth Defends Actions: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says Trump deserves to choose his own team.
• Call to Block New Nominations: The group urges the Senate to halt confirmations, including that of Trump’s nominee, Lt. Gen. Dan Caine.
• Legal Questions Over New Chairman: Caine lacks the required experience for the role, but Trump could issue a waiver.
• Unprecedented Firings: The letter notes that past Pentagon dismissals had clear justifications, unlike Trump’s latest removals.
• Congressional Oversight Urged: Lawmakers are asked to demand explanations for each firing and investigate potential political motives.

Deep Look

Trump’s Sweeping Military Shake-Up Sparks National Security Concerns

In a rare bipartisan rebuke, five former U.S. secretaries of defense have urged Congress to investigate President Donald Trump’s abrupt firings of top military leaders, warning that the move threatens military stability and erodes legal constraints on executive power.

The letter—signed by William Perry, Leon Panetta, Chuck Hagel, Jim Mattis, and Lloyd Austin—specifically questions Trump’s decision to remove Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr. as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff after less than 17 months in the role. The administration offered no formal justification for the firing, prompting concerns over political motivations.

The dismissals extend beyond Brown. Adm. Lisa Franchetti (chief of naval operations), Gen. Jim Slife (vice chief of the Air Force), and multiple judge advocates general (JAGs) from different military branches were also removed in a stunning shake-up.

“We, like many Americans—including many troops—are therefore left to conclude that these leaders are being fired for purely partisan reasons,” the former defense secretaries wrote, emphasizing their concerns about Trump’s handling of the military chain of command.

Bipartisan Alarm Over Politicization of the Military

The five men, who served under both Democratic and Republican administrations, argue that Trump’s actions undermine the long-standing principle of keeping the military apolitical.

• Hagel is a Republican.
• Mattis, an independent, served as Trump’s first defense secretary.
• Perry, Panetta, and Austin are Democrats.
• Four of the five are military veterans, including two retired four-star generals (Mattis and Austin).

Their bipartisan stance underscores the unusual nature of Trump’s decision, which they argue violates the intent of Congress—that the chairman of the Joint Chiefs serves a full four-year term unless removed for cause.

“The House and Senate should demand that the administration justify each firing and fully explain why it violated Congress’ legislative intent,” the letter states.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Defends the Firings

Trump’s Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, has defended the shake-up, arguing that Trump, as commander-in-chief, has the right to choose his military leadership.

Hegseth particularly defended the firing of top military legal officials (JAGs), claiming they were not “well-suited” to provide legal guidance when lawful orders are given.

However, the former defense secretaries dispute this, pointing out that several of the dismissed officers had been nominated by Trump himself for previous roles and had distinguished careers in combat and operations.

The letter warns that these firings set a dangerous precedent, allowing any future president to remove military leaders for purely political reasons.

Congress Urged to Block Trump’s Pick for Joint Chiefs Chairman

The former secretaries also urged the Senate to reject Trump’s nomination of Lt. Gen. Dan Caine as the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, citing serious legal concerns.

• Caine is highly respected in military circles, but his background does not meet the legal criteria for the role.
• By law, a chairman must have served as a combatant commander or service chief—requirements that Caine does not fulfill.
• Trump, however, can issue a waiver to bypass these requirements, though doing so would be highly unusual.

The letter warns that allowing Caine’s appointment would further erode institutional norms and weaken civilian oversight of the military.

What Makes These Firings Different?

While three-star and four-star officers have been removed in the past, these firings stand out because they lack clear justifications.

Previous dismissals of senior officers have typically been due to:

• Disagreements over war strategies (e.g., Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts).
• Failures in nuclear oversight.
• Public statements that contradicted presidential policy.

In contrast, the letter argues that Trump’s removals lack transparency and send a chilling message to military leaders—that they can be fired without warning, regardless of their performance.

The Path Forward: Will Congress Intervene?

With Trump’s latest military moves under scrutiny, lawmakers face increasing pressure to:

1. Investigate the firings: Demand formal justifications for each dismissal.
2. Block questionable Pentagon appointments: Prevent Caine’s nomination from advancing without legal justification.
3. Protect the independence of the military: Ensure future presidents do not use the military for political gain.

A congressional hearing into the firings could set a precedent for how military dismissals are handled going forward. However, whether Republican-controlled committees will take action remains to be seen.

For now, the former defense secretaries’ letter serves as a major warning—that the current administration’s handling of the military risks undermining institutional norms and national security.

More on US News

Ex-Defense Chiefs Ex-Defense Chiefs