Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah signed a declaration in Beijing on ending a yearslong rift, the groups said Tuesday, taking a step toward resolving a deep divide which has lingered for years despite repeated attempts at unifying the sides.
Quick Read
- Hamas and Fatah sign declaration in Beijing on ending yearslong rift as war rages in Gaza.
- Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah signed the Beijing Declaration to end their division and strengthen Palestinian unity.
- The declaration pledges to form a unity government for the Palestinian territories, though similar past declarations have failed.
- The agreement comes as the Israel-Hamas war continues into its 10th month, complicating postwar leadership planning for Gaza.
- Israel opposes any Hamas role in governing Gaza postwar and rejects calls for the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority to run Gaza.
- Hamas officials have proposed forming a government of technocrats agreed upon by various Palestinian factions, preparing for elections in Gaza and the West Bank.
- Israel’s Foreign Minister Israel Katz rejected the agreement, stating that joint governance between Hamas and Fatah in Gaza will not happen.
- The Beijing Declaration highlights China’s growing role in Middle East diplomacy.
- A joint statement from the talks in Beijing did not specify details on forming the government but reiterated commitment to a Palestinian state based on pre-1967 borders.
- The deal does not resolve the differing stances of Hamas and Fatah on Israel; Hamas refuses to officially recognize Israel, while Fatah abides by interim peace agreements.
- Previous reconciliation agreements from 2011 and 2022 are referenced in the new declaration.
- Fatah and Hamas have been rivals since Hamas took over Gaza in 2007, with the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority administering parts of the West Bank.
- The agreement aims to widen PLO membership to include factions like Hamas, though implementation is expected after a possible cease-fire.
- Hamas praised the agreement as a step towards national unity, but the deal lacks a specific timeline.
- The U.S. envisions a revamped Palestinian Authority ruling postwar Gaza, though Israel has rejected this idea without proposing a credible alternative.
- Palestinian Islamic Jihad, allied with Hamas, rejected any agreement involving implicit or explicit recognition of Israel.
The Associated Press has the story:
Hamas & Fatah sign declaration in Beijing on ending yearslong rift as war rages in Gaza
Newslooks- RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) —
Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah signed a declaration in Beijing on ending a yearslong rift, the groups said Tuesday, taking a step toward resolving a deep divide which has lingered for years despite repeated attempts at unifying the sides.
The two heavyweights of Palestinian politics signed the Beijing Declaration on “ending division and strengthening Palestinian unity,” according to Chinese state broadcaster CCTV, pledging to form a unity government for the Palestinian territories. But previous such declarations have failed, including a similar deal in 2011, casting doubt over whether the China-sponsored negotiations might actually lead to a resolution.
The declaration comes at a sensitive time, as the war in Gaza rages on into its 10th month and as Israel and Hamas are weighing an internationally backed cease-fire proposal that would wind down the war and free dozens of Israeli hostages held by Hamas.
The question of Palestinian political unity could complicate planning for a postwar leadership structure for Gaza, one of the thornier issues in the ongoing peace talks. Hamas won parliamentary elections in Gaza in 2006 and then overran the territory in a violent takeover the following year.
Gaza’s postwar future remains in doubt. Israel vehemently opposes any Hamas role in governing Gaza after the war. It has also rejected calls from the United States for the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority to run Gaza after the fighting ends.
Since the current war broke out in Gaza almost 10 months ago, Hamas officials have said that the party does not want to return to ruling Gaza as it did before the conflict, and the group has called for formation of a government of technocrats to be agreed upon by the various Palestinian factions, which would prepare the way for elections for both Gaza and the West Bank, with the intention of forming a unified government. But both Israel and the PA have deep distrusts about Hamas’ intentions.
Israel’s Foreign Minister, Israel Katz, swiftly rejected the agreement Tuesday, stating that no joint governance between Hamas and Fatah in Gaza will take place “because Hamas’s rule will be crushed.” The two rival Palestinian groups, along with 12 other political factions, met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, concluding talks that started Sunday, according to a post on social media platform Weibo from Chinese TV network CGTN.
The agreement also underscores China’s growing role in Middle East diplomacy, with success in the restoration of relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran. “But to be sure, China is still the process of trying to earn credibility as a global mediator,” said James Char, a research fellow at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.
A joint statement issued after the most recent talks in Beijing gave no details on how or when the government would be formed, saying only that it would be done “by agreement among the factions.” According to the joint statement, the two groups are committed to the creation of a Palestinian state on lands Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war.
The deal does not appear to bridge the two group’s diverging position on Israel. Hamas previously said it would accept a state based on the pre-1967 war borders, while also refusing to officially recognize Israel. The Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority, meanwhile, abides by interim peace agreements with Israel signed in the early 1990s.
The agreement signed by the Palestinian factions promised to follow up on previous reconciliation agreements signed in both 2011 and 2022. “The understanding in China is based on widening the scope of the membership on the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) to include other factions who have not joined it” including Hamas, said Jamal Nazzal, a Fatah spokesperson. “It’s a long way ahead, and most of it will be implemented after a possible cease-fire,” he added.
Fatah and Hamas have been rivals since Hamas violently routed forces loyal to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah in Gaza in 2007, taking over the impoverished coastal enclave. The Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority, headed by Abbas, administers parts of the occupied West Bank. It is widely viewed by the Palestinian public as corrupt, out of touch, and a subcontractor for Israel because of their joint security coordination.
Hamas members have never been part of PLO, the Palestinian government body responsible for international affairs. In a statement, Husam Badran, a Hamas political official based in Qatar, praised the agreement, describing it as a further “positive step towards achieving Palestinian national unity.”
But Tuesday’s deal doesn’t have a hard timeline. “There is an opportunity … but it is not big, because it lacks a specific timetable for implementation,” said Hani Al-Masry, an expert on Palestinian reconciliation affairs. Repeated attempts at mending the rift have failed, wrecked by the factions’ own bitter rivalry over power and the West’s refusal to accept any government that includes Hamas unless it expressly recognizes Israel.
United States President Joe Biden’s administration envisions a revamped Palestinian Authority ruling postwar Gaza and has sought a series of reforms that might make it a viable presence in the war-ravaged territory. Israel rejected that idea, but has not put forward a credible alternative for who will govern Gaza.
The Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a smaller militant group allied with Hamas, issued a statement Tuesday after the talks saying that it still “rejects any formula that includes recognition of Israel explicitly or implicitly” and that it had “demanded the withdrawal of the Palestine Liberation Organization’s recognition of Israel.”
