Harris Faces Pressure to Define Presidency Separate from Biden \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ With less than four weeks until Election Day, Vice President Kamala Harris is feeling increased pressure to clearly outline how her presidency would differ from President Joe Biden’s. Although she emphasizes her unique leadership style, she has been reluctant to publicly criticize Biden’s decisions, complicating her efforts to position herself as a candidate of change. With Trump seizing on this hesitance, Harris is now rethinking her messaging to better showcase her vision for the future while maintaining loyalty to the current administration.
Harris Balances Biden Loyalty and Change: Quick Looks
- Election Countdown: Just weeks remain for Harris to define her potential presidency.
- Reluctance to Criticize: Harris is cautious about distancing herself from Biden, focusing on continuity rather than confrontation.
- Generational Change: Harris is framing herself as the candidate of the future, contrasting her youth with Biden and Trump.
- Trump’s Attacks: Trump capitalizes on Harris’ hesitance to critique Biden, using it as a rallying point.
- Campaign Strategy: Allies urge Harris to differentiate herself more clearly from Biden, but she remains cautious not to undermine his record.
Deep Look:
With Election Day approaching rapidly, Vice President Kamala Harris faces the daunting task of striking a delicate balance between maintaining loyalty to President Joe Biden and crafting her own narrative of leadership and change. The pressure to distinguish herself has intensified as her unexpected candidacy now stands in a tight race against former President Donald Trump. In this high-stakes political environment, Harris must both reassure voters that she will continue the progress made under Biden while signaling that her presidency will offer a fresh direction.
Harris’ challenge became evident during an interview on ABC’s The View, when she was directly asked how her leadership would differ from Biden’s. Her response, while emphasizing that she and Biden are “two different people,” failed to identify specific policy differences. She noted that she would bring her own “sensibilities” to leadership but when pressed to name a decision made by Biden that she would have handled differently, Harris demurred, stating, “There is not a thing that comes to mind.”
This cautious approach reflects the vice president’s deep loyalty to Biden, but it also underscores the challenge of presenting herself as a candidate for change without appearing disloyal to the president she has served under for nearly four years. As she faces increasing pressure to clarify her vision for the future, Harris is finding it difficult to navigate the line between respecting Biden’s presidency and demonstrating that she can lead the country in a new direction.
Her candidacy, which began abruptly after Biden’s withdrawal from the race in July, has so far leaned heavily on her age and biography to signify a generational shift. At 59, Harris is a stark contrast to both Biden, 82, and Trump, 78. Her historic candidacy as the first Black and South Asian woman to be a major party nominee also reinforces the message of change. Yet, her struggle to differentiate herself on policy issues may hinder her ability to fully convince voters that her presidency would bring the fresh leadership many are seeking.
The Need to Balance Change and Continuity
Harris’ campaign team is walking a fine line, attempting to project her as a candidate of generational change while avoiding any sharp criticisms of Biden’s presidency that could be perceived as opportunistic. Aides within her campaign say Harris is deeply loyal to Biden and feels a strong sense of responsibility to protect the accomplishments of the administration. However, with Biden’s approval ratings hovering underwater for much of the past two years, there is growing concern that Harris needs to find ways to distinguish herself without alienating her base.
Biden’s administration has seen notable legislative achievements, including a major infrastructure package, lowering prescription drug costs, and expanding access to healthcare. These are policies Harris has actively supported and would likely continue if elected president. In private, Harris and her team grapple with the challenge of breaking from Biden on certain issues, recognizing that any public criticism of his policies could undermine their shared successes. The risks of such a break are especially high on foreign policy, where the U.S. is facing global crises, and a divide between Harris and Biden could weaken the Democratic position.
Still, some Harris allies argue that she needs to make a stronger case for how her leadership would offer something new, especially given that Biden is not on the ballot. Jamal Simmons, Harris’ former communications director, has urged her to focus more on what voters want for the future, arguing that winning the election should be her priority. “She should do what’s best,” Simmons said. “Winning will make Joe Biden feel a lot better than anything else.” Harris’ candidacy, Simmons suggests, needs to acknowledge the dissatisfaction voters feel with Biden, whether fair or not, to bring undecided voters on board.
Trump’s Exploitation of Harris’ Reluctance
Trump has not missed the opportunity to seize on Harris’ hesitation to critique Biden. At a recent campaign rally in Pennsylvania, Trump played a clip of Harris’ The View appearance, using it to mock her inability to name any differences between her leadership style and Biden’s. His supporters cheered as Trump used the moment to frame Harris as a continuation of Biden’s policies, which his campaign has consistently criticized as ineffective.
This kind of attack underscores the challenge Harris faces in maintaining loyalty to Biden while projecting herself as an agent of change. Republican strategist Alex Conant pointed out that vice presidents historically struggle to separate themselves from the presidents they served under, and Harris is no exception. Conant argues that Harris’ line about being “not Joe Biden” is catchy, but lacks the substance needed to win over voters. “She should be able to point to three things at the ready that she’d do differently,” he said, adding that Harris’ failure to outline these differences plays right into Trump’s narrative.
Finding Her Own Path Forward
Harris has introduced some policies that mark a shift from Biden’s positions, such as proposing a smaller increase in the capital gains tax than Biden initially sought. Additionally, during her The View appearance, she suggested she would include a Republican in her Cabinet, a move designed to show her willingness to work across party lines. However, these policy shifts have been relatively modest, and the Biden White House has largely supported Harris’ positions, further blurring the lines between their agendas.
As Election Day approaches, Harris faces a critical question: How can she craft a vision of leadership that builds on Biden’s achievements while offering something distinct enough to capture the attention of undecided voters? Democratic strategist Alyssa Cass believes Harris needs to do more to address the concerns of voters who are dissatisfied with the current administration. “She needs to communicate clearly to voters something she would have done differently that acknowledges some of the dissatisfaction they have,” Cass said. This would help voters feel more comfortable with Harris as a potential president and as a candidate who could solve the problems they feel have not been addressed under Biden.
At the same time, Harris must manage her role as vice president, which continues to pull her back into the spotlight with Biden during moments of crisis. While her campaign has sought to create distance between the two, she has still appeared by Biden’s side to manage natural disasters like hurricanes and address international emergencies such as the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. These appearances complicate her efforts to carve out her own space on the campaign trail, but they are part of her responsibilities as vice president.
Historical Precedents and Challenges
Harris is not the first vice president to face this dilemma. In 2000, then-Vice President Al Gore kept his distance from President Bill Clinton, whose impeachment scandal over an affair with a White House intern had tarnished his presidency. Similarly, in 1988, President Ronald Reagan, at age 78, did not campaign aggressively for his vice president, George H.W. Bush, who went on to win the presidency. These historical examples highlight the challenges vice presidents face when trying to strike out on their own while remaining tied to the administration they served.
Eric Schultz, a former Obama spokesperson, suggests that Harris’ focus on being an agent of change is a smart strategy, especially as it emphasizes the generational contrast between her and Trump. “There’s no question that the campaign understands the imperative for her to be an agent of change,” Schultz said, adding that Harris’ “new way forward” is a signal to voters that her presidency would be future-oriented, addressing the challenges of tomorrow rather than simply maintaining the status quo.
Harris’ challenge, however, remains formidable. With Biden’s approval ratings consistently underwater and the clock ticking toward Election Day, she must convince voters that her presidency will offer something different. Whether she can successfully navigate this balancing act between continuity and change will ultimately determine whether she can secure victory in what has become a fiercely competitive race against Trump.
