Hunter Schafer Criticizes Trump’s Policy After Being Listed as Male/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ Hunter Schafer, Euphoria star and transgender woman, received a new U.S. passport listing her as male despite selecting female on her application. She blamed the Trump administration’s gender policies, which recognize only biological sex at birth for official documents. Schafer warned the change could cause travel issues and forced outings at airports.
Hunter Schafer’s Passport Dispute: Quick Looks
- Passport Controversy: Schafer’s new U.S. passport incorrectly lists her as male.
- Policy Shift Blamed: She criticizes Trump’s executive order limiting gender recognition.
- Travel Concerns: Schafer expects airport challenges and privacy issues during trips.
- Previous Gender Marker: Her earlier passport listed her as female since her teens.
- Policy Details: U.S. passports now only offer M or F, based on birth-assigned sex.
- No More ‘X’ Option: Biden-era non-binary options were revoked under Trump’s order.
- Personal Impact: Schafer says it’s “not just talk—it’s real and happening.”
- Border Worries: Fears of being outed at security checks are a major concern.
- Broad Implications: Policy affects all transgender and non-binary Americans seeking documents.
- Fan Reaction: Supporters express outrage, calling for restoration of inclusive ID options.
Hunter Schafer Criticizes Trump’s Policy After Being Listed as Male
Deep Look:
Hunter Schafer Calls Out U.S. Gender Policy After Passport Lists Her as Male
Hunter Schafer, the 26-year-old transgender actress and model best known for her role as Jules Vaughn in HBO’s Euphoria, has spoken out against the Trump administration’s gender policies after receiving a new U.S. passport that incorrectly identifies her as male.
In a viral TikTok video, Schafer displayed the passport’s “M” marker, saying she was “shocked” since she had selected female on her application forms. “I just didn’t think it was actually going to happen,” she told followers.
What Happened?
- Schafer applied for a replacement passport after losing her previous one overseas.
- Despite indicating her female gender on the application, the issued passport lists her as male.
- Her previous passport reflected her correct gender marker, making the new document a sudden and frustrating change.
Why the Change?
- The error stems from President Donald Trump’s executive order signed on his first day of office, which:
- Recognizes only two sexes—male and female—based on birth records.
- Eliminated the “X” gender option for non-binary, intersex, and gender non-conforming individuals.
- States that “Sex is not changeable and does not include gender identity.”
U.S. State Department policy: Passports now require sex markers to match biological sex at birth.
Schafer’s Reaction:
“I just feel like it’s important to share that it’s not just talk—this is real and happening,” Schafer said.
The actress expressed concerns about future travel issues, especially potential confrontations at border security.
“I’m pretty sure I’ll have to out myself to border patrol agents much more often than I should have to,” she added.
Broader Context:
- Under the Biden administration (2022):
- Passports offered an “X” gender option for non-binary and trans individuals.
- Applicants could self-select gender without matching birth certificates.
- Under Trump’s executive order:
- Only M or F designations are allowed.
- Gender markers must reflect original birth-assigned sex.
- Existing passports with non-matching genders may be invalidated upon renewal.
Why This Matters:
- Travel Impacts: Mismatched IDs can cause delays, harassment, and forced disclosure at checkpoints.
- Legal Confusion: Many states allow gender marker changes on IDs, contradicting federal passport rules.
- Mental Health Concerns: Being misgendered on legal documents contributes to stress and discrimination for trans individuals.
Schafer’s Personal History:
- Changed her gender markers on licenses and passports as a teen.
- Did not amend her birth certificate, which may have triggered the passport reclassification.
“No one—no matter how wealthy or famous—is excluded from these policies,” she emphasized.
Reactions and Advocacy:
- LGBTQ+ advocates called for restoring inclusive passport policies.
- Fans flooded social media with messages of support and outrage.
- Legal experts warn of potential constitutional challenges to the executive order.
What’s Next?
- Schafer plans to travel abroad next week but anticipates airport difficulties.
- Advocacy groups urge the State Department to reconsider the policy.
- Legal challenges against the executive order are expected to mount.
“Today I saw it,” Schafer said. “This is happening, and it affects us all.”
You must Register or Login to post a comment.