Judge Blocks Musk’s DOGE from Accessing Sensitive Treasury Data/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ A federal judge has blocked Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing sensitive U.S. Treasury records. The ruling comes after 19 Democratic attorneys general sued the Trump administration, arguing that DOGE’s access violates federal law and threatens Americans’ financial privacy. The case raises concerns over data security and Musk’s growing influence over government operations.
![](https://www.newslooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/AP25034666572542-1024x683.jpg)
Judge Blocks Musk’s DOGE from Treasury Records – Quick Look
- Court Injunction: A federal judge ruled against DOGE accessing Treasury Department payment records.
- Privacy Concerns: Data includes Social Security numbers and bank details of millions of Americans.
- Legal Challenge: 19 Democratic attorneys general argue DOGE’s access is illegal and unconstitutional.
- Political Tensions: Critics claim Musk’s agency is exceeding its authority; supporters say it cuts wasteful spending.
- Future Hearing: A court hearing on the case is set for February 14.
- Treasury Department’s Role: The agency has defended the access, claiming it ensures system integrity.
- Wider Fallout: Lawmakers and advocacy groups are pushing for further investigations into DOGE’s activities.
Judge Blocks Musk’s DOGE from Accessing Sensitive Treasury Data
Judge Blocks Musk’s DOGE from Treasury Records – Deep Look
Federal Court Blocks DOGE’s Access to Sensitive Data
In a major legal blow to the Trump administration, U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued a preliminary injunction early Saturday preventing Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing sensitive records within the U.S. Treasury Department’s central payment system. The system manages tax refunds, Social Security benefits, and veterans’ payments, storing the banking and personal data of millions of Americans.
This ruling follows a lawsuit filed by 19 Democratic attorneys general, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who argue that the Trump administration illegally granted DOGE access in violation of federal law and constitutional protections.
Concerns Over Data Security and Government Overreach
The lawsuit raises critical concerns about privacy violations, financial security, and government oversight. James criticized DOGE’s involvement, calling it an “unelected group led by the world’s richest man” that is unauthorized to handle such data.
“This is the largest data breach in American history,” said Connecticut Attorney General William Tong. “DOGE is an unlawfully constituted band of renegade tech bros combing through confidential records, sensitive data, and critical payment systems. What could go wrong?”
The court’s ruling also requires that any information accessed by DOGE since January 20 be destroyed immediately.
DOGE’s Role in the Trump Administration
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was created under Trump’s second administration with the goal of eliminating wasteful government spending. However, critics argue that its rapid expansion and access to classified financial data present significant risks to privacy and fiscal policy.
DOGE’s ability to review and potentially suspend payments made by U.S. government agencies has fueled concerns that Musk and Trump could use the department to cut funding to programs they oppose, such as foreign aid and social welfare programs.
Musk, who frequently mocks his critics on X (formerly Twitter), has defended DOGE’s actions, claiming it is already saving taxpayers millions by uncovering unnecessary government spending.
Treasury Department’s Defense and Political Fallout
The U.S. Treasury Department, under Secretary Scott Bessent, argues that DOGE’s review is aimed at assessing system integrity, denying that any unauthorized changes are being made. However, legal experts and lawmakers worry that DOGE’s unchecked access could lead to unauthorized budget cuts or mismanagement of federal funds.
A separate lawsuit filed by labor unions and advocacy groups also seeks to block DOGE’s access, while Democratic lawmakers have called for a full Treasury Department investigation into the agency’s activities.
Additionally, a Washington court ruled on Thursday to temporarily restrict two DOGE employees’ access to Treasury data, allowing only “read-only” privileges.
What Comes Next?
With a court hearing scheduled for February 14, the future of DOGE’s role in financial oversight remains uncertain. If the judge’s ruling holds, it could significantly limit Musk’s influence over government spending and data access.
For now, the lawsuit represents a major legal and political battle over executive power, data privacy, and financial governance in Trump’s second term.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.