NewsPoliticsTop StoryUS

Judge rejects Trump’s claim of immunity in his federal 2020 election prosecution

Donald Trump is not immune from prosecution in his election interference case in Washington, a federal judge ruled Friday, knocking down the Republican’s bid to derail the case charging him with plotting to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Quick Read

  1. Judge Rules Against Trump’s Immunity Claim: A federal judge, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, ruled that former President Donald Trump is not immune from prosecution in the election interference case in Washington.
  2. Legal Battle Expected to Escalate: This decision is likely to escalate into a broader legal battle regarding presidential powers, potentially reaching the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump’s team is expected to appeal quickly.
  3. Details of the Ruling: Chutkan stated that former presidents do not have special conditions regarding their federal criminal liability and can be investigated, indicted, prosecuted, convicted, and punished for criminal acts committed while in office.
  4. Trump’s Legal Defense: Trump’s lawyers argued that as president, Trump was shielded from prosecution for actions he took while fulfilling presidential duties, asserting that actions in the indictment were core responsibilities of his role.
  5. Scope of Presidential Immunity: The Supreme Court has previously ruled on immunity from civil liability for presidential actions, but the extension of this immunity to criminal prosecution remains unaddressed.
  6. Special Counsel’s Position: Special counsel Jack Smith’s team argued that there is no constitutional or legal precedent supporting the idea that a former president cannot be prosecuted for criminal conduct committed during their tenure.
  7. Multiple Criminal Cases Against Trump: Trump faces four criminal cases: the election interference case in Washington, illegal possession of classified documents in Florida, a conspiracy charge in Georgia relating to election loss, and charges in New York regarding hush-money payments.

The Associated Press has the story:

Judge rejects Trump’s claim of immunity in his federal 2020 election prosecution

Newslooks- WASHINGTON (AP)

Donald Trump is not immune from prosecution in his election interference case in Washington, a federal judge ruled Friday, knocking down the Republican’s bid to derail the case charging him with plotting to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s decision tees up a legal fight over the scope of presidential power that could ultimately reach the U.S Supreme Court. Trump, who has denied any wrongdoing in the case, is expected to quickly appeal to fight what his lawyers have characterized as an unsettled legal question.

In her ruling, Chutkan said “former Presidents enjoy no special conditions on their federal criminal liability.”

“Defendant may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office,” she wrote.

FILE – This undated photo provided by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, shows U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. Chutkan, the federal judge overseeing the 2020 election interference case against former President Donald Trump says those involved in the case must not disclose possible jurors’ names as she set rules around conducting research into potential members of the jury.(Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts via AP, File)

Trump’s legal team had argued that the case, which is scheduled to go to trial in March, should be dismissed because the 2024 Republican presidential primary front-runner is shielded from prosecution for actions he took while fulfilling his duties as president. They assert that the actions detailed in the indictment — including pressing state officials on the administration of elections — cut to the core of Trump’s responsibilities as commander in chief.

The Supreme Court has held that presidents are immune from civil liability for actions related to their official duties, but the justices have never grappled with the question of whether that immunity extends to criminal prosecution.

FILE – Special counsel Jack Smith speaks to the media about an indictment of former President Donald Trump, Aug. 1, 2023, at an office of the Department of Justice in Washington. Federal prosecutors and lawyers for Donald Trump will argue in court Monday, Oct. 16, over a proposed gag order aimed at reining in the former president’s diatribes against likely witnesses and others in his 2020 election interference case in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team has said there nothing in the Constitution, or in court precedent, to support the idea that a former president cannot be prosecuted for criminal conduct committed while in the White House.

“The defendant is not above the law. He is subject to the federal criminal laws like more than 330 million other Americans, including Members of Congress, federal judges, and everyday citizens,” prosecutors wrote in court papers.

It’s one of four criminal cases Trump is facing while he seeks to reclaim the White House in 2024. Smith has separately charged Trump in Florida with illegally hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after he left the White House. Trump is also charged in Georgia with conspiring to overturn his election loss to President Joe Biden. And he faces charges in New York related to hush-money payments made during the 2016 campaign.

For more U.S. news

Previous Article
Renewed Gaza fighting: Overwhelmed hospitals receive new wave of wounded
Next Article
Israel intensifies its assault on Southern Gaza, rising concerns about civilian deaths

How useful was this article?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this article.

Latest News

Menu