Man Convicted of Killing 10 in Colorado Shooting \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Ahmad Alissa, who fatally shot 10 people in a Boulder, Colorado, supermarket in 2021, was convicted of murder and faces life in prison. Despite his schizophrenia diagnosis, prosecutors argued that Alissa was sane at the time of the attack, showing deliberate actions. The defense pleaded insanity, but the jury found him guilty of murder.
Boulder Supermarket Shooter Convicted of Murder Quick Looks
- Conviction: Ahmad Alissa was convicted of killing 10 people in the 2021 Boulder supermarket shooting and now faces life in prison.
- Mental Illness Defense: Alissa, diagnosed with schizophrenia, pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, but prosecutors argued he could tell right from wrong.
- Deliberate Attack: Prosecutors emphasized Alissa’s preparation for the attack, including using illegal high-capacity magazines and targeting specific victims.
- Survivors and Families: Victims’ families attended the trial, with some shedding tears as the verdict was read; survivors recalled their harrowing experiences during the attack.
- No Motive Identified: Although Alissa’s search history indicated he considered various public locations, no clear motive for the shooting was presented by prosecutors.
Deep Look
In a long-awaited decision, Ahmad Alissa was convicted on Monday of murdering 10 people in a 2021 shooting at a King Soopers supermarket in Boulder, Colorado. Alissa, who suffers from schizophrenia, pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, but a jury ultimately found him guilty of murder, determining that he was sane at the time of the attack. He now faces life in prison for the deadly rampage that sent shockwaves through the community.
The supermarket massacre unfolded on a calm day in March 2021, when Alissa, armed with a semi-automatic weapon, entered the store and opened fire. His attack killed 10 people in just over a minute, including a police officer who responded to the scene. Alissa shot his victims as soon as he got out of his car in the parking lot and continued his assault inside the store before surrendering after being shot in the leg by police.
Despite his schizophrenia diagnosis, the defense’s argument that Alissa was legally insane and couldn’t distinguish right from wrong at the time of the attack did not sway the jury. Prosecutors presented evidence to show that Alissa acted with deliberate intent, pursuing specific individuals and bringing illegal high-capacity magazines loaded with steel-piercing bullets, designed to maximize the deadly impact.
The courtroom remained mostly silent as the verdict was read, with a few tears shed by the victims’ families, who have endured a long and emotional journey for justice. The judge had warned against any emotional outbursts during the announcement of the convictions. Alissa’s conviction for murder marks a significant moment for the families of the victims, but it also highlights the challenges of balancing mental health defenses in high-profile criminal cases.
The defense team, while not disputing that Alissa had shot and killed the victims, argued that his mental illness prevented him from understanding the consequences of his actions. Alissa, who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia after the shooting, had shown signs of paranoia and withdrawal in the years leading up to the attack. His family members testified that his behavior had worsened after contracting COVID-19 in 2020, and they reported that he was hearing voices before the shooting.
However, state forensic psychologists who evaluated Alissa before the trial concluded that he was sane during the attack. While acknowledging that Alissa did experience auditory hallucinations, the psychologists determined that he was still aware of his actions and their moral consequences. They pointed to his fear of being arrested or killed by police as evidence that he knew his actions were wrong. Though Alissa mentioned hearing “killing voices” before the shooting, he failed to provide specific details about what the voices were saying during multiple hours of interviews.
Defense lawyers highlighted the psychologists’ own admissions that they lacked full confidence in their conclusions, largely because Alissa did not provide more detailed information about his experience with the voices. The psychologists did concede that Alissa’s mental illness played a role in the attack, acknowledging that it might not have occurred if he were mentally stable. However, they maintained that mental illness and legal insanity are distinct, with the latter requiring an inability to tell right from wrong under Colorado law.
The testimonies of survivors and victims’ families were harrowing, offering a glimpse into the terror inside the supermarket during the attack. One emergency room doctor recalled crawling onto a shelf and hiding among bags of potato chips to escape the gunfire. A pharmacist, who took cover as shots rang out, testified that she heard Alissa say “This is fun” as he continued shooting through the store with his semi-automatic pistol, which resembled an AR-15 rifle.
The emotional toll of the trial was clear, with family members attending the proceedings to witness justice for their loved ones. Graphic footage from surveillance cameras and police bodycams was shown during the trial, documenting the attack’s rapid and devastating unfolding. Survivors shared their stories of narrowly escaping the shooting, and in some cases, helping others reach safety.
While prosecutors did not offer a clear motive for the attack, Alissa’s online search history provided some insight into his planning. He had initially searched for public places in Boulder to attack, including bars and restaurants, but shifted his focus to large stores the day before the shooting. On the day of the attack, he drove from his home in Arvada, a suburb of Denver, and stopped at the first supermarket he encountered. In just a matter of minutes, he shot three people in the parking lot before entering the store and continuing his rampage.
Alissa’s family members, including his parents, testified about his declining mental health in the years leading up to the shooting. His mother described him as “sick,” while his father believed that Alissa might have been possessed by a djin, or evil spirit, a concept in their Syrian culture. Despite these concerns, the family did not seek treatment for him due to the perceived shame it would bring.
The verdict comes after a two-week trial filled with emotional testimony and difficult revelations. Earlier in the proceedings, former OceanGate operations director David Lochridge spoke of the company’s financial motivations and clashed with Rush over its business direction. The case has revived debates over the treatment of individuals with mental illness in the criminal justice system and whether more should have been done to address Alissa’s condition before it culminated in tragedy.
Though Alissa has been found guilty, questions remain about how mental illness, gun laws, and access to high-capacity magazines contributed to this devastating event. The tragedy has left an indelible mark on the Boulder community, with survivors and families still grappling with the loss and the emotional scars of the attack. Alissa’s conviction may bring some closure to the victims’ families, but it also serves as a reminder of the ongoing need to address the complex intersections of mental health and public safety.
Man Convicted Man Convicted Man Convicted Man Convicted
