Orthodox Jewish Passenger Sues United Over Bathroom Incident \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ An Orthodox Jewish man has filed a lawsuit against United Airlines and the Department of Homeland Security, alleging forced removal from an airplane bathroom mid-constipation. The lawsuit claims the pilot made anti-Semitic remarks and exposed the passenger’s genitalia to others. The incident led to public detention, missed flights, and additional expenses.
Orthodox Jewish Passenger’s Lawsuit Against United: Quick Looks
- Yisroel Liebb sues United Airlines after a mid-flight bathroom incident.
- The pilot allegedly broke the door lock and dragged Liebb out.
- Liebb claims he was exposed to passengers with pants around ankles.
- Incident occurred on a flight from Tulum, Mexico, to Houston.
- Liebb says the pilot made disparaging comments about Jewish passengers.
- CBP officers detained Liebb and fellow traveler Jacob Sebbag in Houston.
- Passengers were handcuffed, placed in holding cells, and luggage searched.
- Homeland Security allegedly told them “You have no rights here.”
- United Airlines rebooked them for free but costs incurred due to delay.
- Lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court seeks damages for humiliation and discrimination.
Deep Look
United Airlines is facing a federal lawsuit from Yisroel Liebb, an Orthodox Jewish passenger from New Jersey, who alleges he was forcibly removed from an airplane bathroom by a pilot, exposing him mid-constipation to fellow passengers. The incident took place on January 28 aboard a flight from Tulum, Mexico, to Houston, and has sparked significant outrage and legal action against both the airline and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
A Shocking Incident Mid-Flight
According to the lawsuit filed this week in Manhattan federal court, Liebb experienced severe gastrointestinal distress during the flight and remained in the rear lavatory for approximately 20 minutes. Concerned crew members allegedly woke his travel companion, Jacob Sebbag, another Orthodox Jewish passenger, and asked him to check on Liebb.
Liebb reassured Sebbag that he was nearly done, and Sebbag relayed the information to the flight attendants. But about 10 minutes later, the situation escalated when the pilot personally intervened. According to court documents, the pilot approached Sebbag, demanded that Liebb exit the restroom immediately, and, upon receiving assurances that he would soon emerge, forcibly broke the bathroom lock.
In a humiliating moment described in the lawsuit, the pilot reportedly yanked open the door and dragged Liebb out with his pants still around his ankles, exposing him to other passengers, flight attendants, and Sebbag.
Allegations of Religious Discrimination
The lawsuit further alleges that the pilot pushed both Liebb and Sebbag back to their seats while making disparaging comments about their Orthodox Jewish faith, reportedly saying derogatory things about “how Jews act.” The plaintiffs claim that the humiliation they endured was amplified by these offensive remarks, which they argue reflect a deep bias from airline staff.
Detention and Harsh Treatment Upon Landing
Upon landing in Houston, matters took another troubling turn. The lawsuit states that six officers from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) boarded the plane and removed Liebb and Sebbag in handcuffs. The men were paraded through the terminal and placed in holding cells where their luggage was thoroughly searched.
Liebb recounts that when he asked why they were being detained, a CBP officer reportedly tightened his handcuffs and said, “This isn’t county or state. We are Homeland. You have no rights here.” This alleged statement has drawn significant concern over the treatment of passengers under federal custody.
United Airlines’ Response and Legal Silence
United Airlines has declined to comment on the pending litigation. CBP Assistant Commissioner Hilton Beckham confirmed that CBP officers responded to reports of a disturbance at the airline’s request but declined to provide further comment due to ongoing legal proceedings.
Jacob Sebbag, the other passenger involved, has joined Liebb in the lawsuit, seeking damages for both the humiliation suffered on the plane and the distress experienced during their detention. Messages seeking comment from their attorney have gone unanswered.
Financial and Emotional Toll
Though United Airlines rebooked Liebb and Sebbag on a flight to New York City the following day at no charge, the pair incurred unexpected expenses for hotel accommodations and food during their forced overnight stay in Houston. The lawsuit states that the financial loss compounded the emotional trauma both men suffered.
Liebb and Sebbag claim they missed critical appointments and family obligations due to the delay and are pursuing compensation for both financial losses and the public humiliation they endured.
Broader Implications
The incident raises significant questions about airline policies, passenger rights, and religious discrimination. It also highlights concerns regarding how airline staff handle medical emergencies or prolonged bathroom use during flights. The aggressive nature of the pilot’s actions and the reported comments suggest a lack of sensitivity and professionalism, sparking debate over how passengers of diverse backgrounds are treated in transit.
The Department of Homeland Security’s alleged heavy-handed treatment of the two passengers also brings into focus concerns about the use of authority and respect for civil rights. The statement, “You have no rights here,” if confirmed, would point to troubling conduct by federal officers in violation of basic legal protections.
Legal Action Moving Forward
The lawsuit demands accountability from both United Airlines and Homeland Security for what Liebb and Sebbag describe as an unwarranted, degrading, and discriminatory experience. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for emotional distress, defamation, financial loss, and violations of their civil rights.
The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for how airlines and federal authorities handle future incidents involving religious or ethnic minorities, bathroom emergencies, and conflicts in-flight. The court will also likely examine the balance between flight security protocols and respect for personal dignity.
As this case proceeds, it serves as a reminder that airlines and federal agencies must enforce rules with humanity, fairness, and respect for diversity — or risk significant public and legal backlash.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.