Philadelphia DA Sues Elon Musk Over $1M Trump Campaign Prize

Philadelphia DA Sues Elon Musk Over $1M Trump Campaign Prize \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner has filed a lawsuit to block Elon Musk’s $1 million giveaway, claiming it could interfere with election integrity. The America PAC, supporting Donald Trump, has been offering daily $1 million prizes to participants in battleground states who back the Constitution. This lawsuit, filed just ahead of Election Day, marks the first legal action against the sweepstakes.

Philadelphia Lawsuit Against Musk’s $1M Giveaway: Quick Looks

• Lawsuit Initiated: Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner sues Musk to stop his America PAC’s daily $1 million giveaways.
• Election Concerns: The giveaway may risk influencing election integrity, Krasner’s office argues.
• Sweepstakes Details: Contestants from swing states sign a petition backing constitutional rights to enter.
• Federal Law Implications: Experts suggest the sweepstakes may conflict with laws against paying voters.
• Biden’s Statement: President Biden has publicly called the giveaway “totally inappropriate.”
• Musk’s Stance: Musk argues the money is both a prize and earnings for speaking on behalf of the PAC.

Deep Look

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner announced Monday that his office has filed a lawsuit aimed at stopping tech mogul Elon Musk’s ongoing $1 million daily giveaway, part of Musk’s efforts to support former President Donald Trump’s campaign through his political action committee, America PAC. With Election Day approaching, the suit challenges the legality of the sweepstakes, which promises $1 million to a participant each day in key battleground states who signs a petition supporting certain Constitutional principles.

Krasner, a Democrat, contends that Musk’s sweepstakes could disrupt the integrity of the upcoming election and possibly violate Pennsylvania’s regulations governing lotteries and trade practices. The legal action focuses on ensuring public protection from what Krasner’s office called “public nuisances and unfair trade practices, including illegal lotteries.” His statement highlighted concerns that such a high-stakes giveaway could also risk interfering with electoral fairness and integrity.

The America PAC contest, launched by Musk as a campaign support tactic, has faced criticism and legal questions from election law specialists who cite federal prohibitions against paying individuals to vote or register to vote. The sweepstakes is open to registered voters in specific swing states, and winners must have signed the PAC’s petition supporting First and Second Amendment rights. Additionally, Musk’s PAC requires winners to serve as spokespeople for the organization, which Musk frames as compensation for advocacy rather than a voting incentive.

The Philadelphia District Attorney’s lawsuit represents the first formal legal action against Musk’s America PAC campaign sweepstakes. In response to requests for comment on the litigation, Musk’s team provided a link to a post on X, where Musk shared an image of a recent $1 million winner holding an oversized check. Musk’s PAC has maintained that the sweepstakes is a legitimate means of engaging voters on constitutional issues without violating election laws.

The federal question of paying voters is complex, as the sweepstakes requires entrants to be registered in battleground states, raising concerns about potential indirect voter influence. Musk’s position is that the giveaway is purely a prize for advocacy, not a voting bribe. However, federal election law bars direct or indirect payments meant to sway voting actions or registration, placing the legality of Musk’s efforts under scrutiny. Krasner has indicated that further criminal investigation remains possible.

President Joe Biden also weighed in, describing the giveaway as “totally inappropriate” when speaking to reporters after casting his ballot in Delaware. Others attending Musk’s rally events offered mixed reactions. Michele Costantino, a retired healthcare administrator from Pennsylvania who attended a recent Musk event, described the initiative as a “good idea,” suggesting it’s a tactic to compete with similar strategies. Costantino expressed her view that the giveaways did not directly incentivize voting and noted that Musk himself is not on the ballot.

The America PAC contest awards participants daily, using the funds to encourage voter engagement around the PAC’s endorsed constitutional principles, as Musk described. Yet, the conditions and timing of the giveaway have raised concerns among legal experts and election integrity advocates, who argue that connecting registration with potential cash prizes, especially in the current political climate, could risk tilting voter behavior.

The Philadelphia lawsuit may affect only Pennsylvania entrants, as the America PAC’s sweepstakes extends to several swing states with various local regulations on campaign-related activities. Without clear federal intervention, differing state legal frameworks complicate broad enforcement. Krasner’s legal filing in Pennsylvania state court classifies the giveaway as a “lottery,” which would make it subject to greater regulatory oversight, potentially complicating its legality in states like Pennsylvania, where such sweepstakes are tightly regulated.

Musk, a longtime public figure known for his leadership of SpaceX, Tesla, and social platform X, has aligned strongly with Trump in this election cycle, stating that he believes civilization’s future may depend on Trump’s reelection. Through his America PAC, Musk has taken a leading role in driving voter turnout for Trump and Republican candidates, reportedly committing over $70 million to this cause. This major investment includes significant contributions to the America PAC and other conservative campaigns nationwide.

With this lawsuit from Philadelphia, Musk’s giveaway faces its first major legal hurdle, potentially challenging its viability in Pennsylvania and highlighting election law complexities as the political climate intensifies. The coming days could see more scrutiny on America PAC’s initiatives as election integrity concerns intersect with high-stakes campaign strategies that utilize significant financial resources.

More on Elections

Philadelphia DA Philadelphia DA