A continent away from the war in Gaza, South Africa accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians and pleaded with the United Nations’ top court on Thursday to urgently order a halt to the country’s military operation. Israel has vehemently denied the allegations.
Quick Read
- Genocide Accusations: South Africa accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians, pleading with the International Court of Justice to order a halt to Israel’s military operation in Gaza.
- South African Arguments: South African lawyers argued that the Gaza war is part of a long-term oppression of Palestinians by Israel. They requested the court to impose binding preliminary orders on Israel, including stopping its military campaign in Gaza.
- Allegations of Genocidal Intent: South Africa’s legal representatives claimed there is evidence of genocidal acts and intentions by Israel based on the past 13 weeks of the conflict.
- Israeli Denial: Israel vehemently denied these allegations, insisting that its actions are not genocidal.
- Protests and Demonstrations: The court proceedings were accompanied by demonstrations, with pro-Israeli protesters supporting Israel and pro-Palestinian protesters calling for an end to Israeli actions.
- Gaza Casualties: More than 23,200 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed, according to the Health Ministry in the Hamas-run enclave.
- Historical Context: The dispute touches on Israel’s identity as a state formed after the Holocaust and South Africa’s history of apartheid, with the African National Congress comparing Israel’s policies to apartheid.
- Israel’s Legal Defense: Despite its usual stance on U.N. and international tribunals, Israel sent a strong legal team to defend its military operation, which was launched in response to Hamas attacks.
- Long Legal Process: A decision on the request for provisional measures will take weeks, and the case itself could last years.
- Israel’s Concerns: Israel fears that any order from the court could negatively impact its international standing, despite its likelihood of non-compliance.
- Broader Implications: South Africa sought to expand the case beyond the Israel-Hamas war, emphasizing the long history of Palestinian oppression.
- Netanyahu’s Statement: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended Israel’s actions, emphasizing the focus on Hamas terrorists and compliance with international law.
- Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza: Reports highlighted the dire living conditions in Gaza, with severe shortages of food, water, and medical supplies.
- U.S. Position: U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken dismissed the case as meritless during a visit to Tel Aviv.
- Historical Precedents: The International Court of Justice has never ruled a country responsible for genocide, with the closest case being Serbia’s violation of the obligation to prevent genocide in Srebrenica in 1995.
- Upcoming Court Hearings: Israel is due to face another hearing at the International Court of Justice regarding the legality of its policies in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
The Associated Press has the story:
South Africa tells the UN top court Israel is committing genocide in Gaza
Newslooks- THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) —
A continent away from the war in Gaza, South Africa accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians and pleaded with the United Nations’ top court on Thursday to urgently order a halt to the country’s military operation. Israel has vehemently denied the allegations.
South African lawyers said during the opening arguments that the latest Gaza war is part of a decadeslong oppression of the Palestinians by Israel.
They asked judges to impose binding preliminary orders on Israel, including an immediate halt to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.
“Genocides are never declared in advance, but this court has the benefit of the past 13 weeks of evidence that shows incontrovertibly a pattern of conduct and related intention that justifies as a plausible claim of genocidal acts,” South African lawyer Adila Hassim told the judges and audience in the packed, ornate room of the Peace Palace in The Hague.
“Nothing will stop the suffering except an order from this court,” she said.
And South Africa insisted Israel committed genocide by design.
“The scale of destruction in Gaza, the targeting of family homes and civilians, the war being a war on children, all make clear that genocidal intent is both understood and has been put into practice. The articulated intent is the destruction of Palestinian life,” said lawyer Tembeka Ngcukaitobi.
“What state would admit to a genocidal intent? Yet the distinctive feature of this case has not been the silence as such, but the reiteration and repetition of genocidal speech throughout every sphere of the state in Israel,” he said.
Ahead of the proceedings, hundreds of pro-Israeli protesters marched close to the courthouse with banners saying “Bring them home,” referring to the hostages held by Hamas since it attacked Israel on Oct. 7. Among the crowds, people held Israeli and Dutch flags.
At a separate demonstration nearby, pro-Palestinians protesters waved flags saying: “End Israeli Apartheid Free Palestine” and chanting “Netanyahu criminal” and “Ceasefire now!”
Israel’s offensive has killed more than 23,200 Palestinians in Gaza, according to the Health Ministry in the Hamas-run enclave.
The dispute strikes at the heart of Israel’s national identity as a Jewish state created in the aftermath of the Nazi genocide in the Holocaust, during which 6 million Jews were murdered.
It also evokes issues central to South Africa’s own identity: Its governing party, the African National Congress, has long compared Israel’s policies in Gaza and the West Bank to its own history under the apartheid regime of white minority rule, which restricted most Blacks to “homelands” before ending in 1994.
In a sign of how seriously Israel is taking the accusation, although it normally considers U.N. and international tribunals unfair and biased, it has sent a strong legal team to defend its military operation launched in the aftermath of the Hamas attacks.
A decision on the request for so-called “provisional measures” will likely take weeks. The case is likely to last years.
While Israel has vehemently denied the allegations and is unlikely to comply with any order from the court to halt operations, it likely fears that any such order would be a blow to its international standing.
Israel’s lawyers will address the court Friday.
South Africa immediately sought to broaden the case beyond the narrow confines of the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.
“The violence and the destruction in Palestine and Israel did not begin on Oct. 7, 2023. The Palestinians have experienced systematic oppression and violence for the last 76 years,” said South African Justice Minister Ronald Lamola.
South Africa argued that Israel’s actions in Gaza are an inevitable party of its history since it declared independence in 1948.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a video statement Wednesday night defending his country’s actions and insisted they had nothing to do with genocide.
“Israel has no intention of permanently occupying Gaza or displacing its civilian population,” he said. “Israel is fighting Hamas terrorists, not the Palestinian population, and we are doing so in full compliance with international law.”
He said the Israeli military is “doing its utmost to minimize civilian casualties, while Hamas is doing its utmost to maximize them by using Palestinian civilians as human shields.”
About two-thirds of the dead in Gaza are women and children, health officials say. The death toll does not distinguish between combatants and civilians.
“Mothers, fathers, children, siblings, grandparents, aunts, cousins are often all killed together. This killing is nothing short of destruction of Palestinian life. It is inflicted deliberately. No one is spared. Not even newborn babies,” said Hassim.
Finding food, water, medicine and working bathrooms has become a daily struggle for Palestinians living in Gaza. Last week, the U.N. humanitarian chief called Gaza “uninhabitable” and said, “People are facing the highest levels of food insecurity ever recorded (and) famine is around the corner.”
Israel itself has always focused attention on the Oct. 7 attacks themselves, when Hamas fighters stormed through several communities in Israel and killed some 1,200 people, mainly civilians. They abducted around 250 others, nearly half of whom have been released.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken dismissed the case as “ meritless ” during a visit to Tel Aviv on Tuesday.
“It is particularly galling, given that those who are attacking Israel — Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, as well as their supporter Iran — continue to call for the annihilation of Israel and the mass murder of Jews,” he said.
The world court, which rules on disputes between nations, has never judged a country to be responsible for genocide. The closest it came was in 2007 when it ruled that Serbia “violated the obligation to prevent genocide” in the July 1995 massacre by Bosnian Serb forces of more than 8,000 Muslim men and boys in the Bosnian enclave of Srebrenica.
The International Criminal Court, based a few miles (kilometers) away in The Hague, prosecutes individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
The case revolves around the genocide convention that was drawn up in 1948 in the aftermath of World War II and the murder of 6 million Jews in the Holocaust. Both Israel and South Africa are signatories.
Israel is back on the International Court of Justice’s docket next month, when hearings open into a U.N. request for a non-binding advisory opinion on the legality of Israeli policies in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
