Top StoryUS

Special Counsel Urges Appeals Court to Allow Trump Report Release

Special Counsel Urges Appeals Court to Allow Trump Report Release/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ The Justice Department has asked an appeals court to overturn Judge Aileen Cannon’s order blocking the release of special counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Donald Trump. The DOJ argues the decision is erroneous and delays the public release of findings on Trump’s election interference efforts. The case reflects tensions over transparency before Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20.

FILE – Former President Donald Trump walks to make comments to members of the media after a jury convicted him of felony crimes for falsifying business records in a scheme to illegally influence the 2016 election, at Manhattan Criminal Court, May 30, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, Pool, File)

DOJ vs. Trump Report Block: Quick Looks

  • The Report: Special counsel Jack Smith’s two-volume report focuses on Trump’s election interference and classified document retention.
  • Judge’s Order: Judge Aileen Cannon blocked the release of the election interference findings, delaying its publication.
  • DOJ’s Argument: The department contends Cannon’s ruling is “plainly erroneous” and interferes with established DOJ authority.
  • Urgency Before Inauguration: Concerns persist that Trump’s administration may obstruct the report’s release once he takes office.

Special Counsel Urges Appeals Court to Allow Trump Report Release

Deep Look

A High-Stakes Court Battle

The Justice Department is urging the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to swiftly overturn Judge Aileen Cannon’s order barring the release of special counsel Jack Smith’s investigative report on President-elect Donald Trump. The report examines Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, which culminated in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

The DOJ filed an emergency motion late Friday, arguing that the lower court’s injunction unjustly delays transparency and violates the authority of the attorney general.

Two Volumes of Controversy

Smith’s investigation produced a two-part report: one detailing Trump’s election interference efforts and another focusing on his retention of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. The DOJ seeks to release the election-related volume before Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration but intends to withhold the classified documents report due to ongoing criminal proceedings against Trump’s co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira.

Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, had previously barred the release of the election interference report until three days after appeals court proceedings concluded. The appeals court already denied an emergency request from Trump’s legal team to block the report but left Cannon’s injunction in place temporarily.

The Justice Department argues that this decision obstructs the release of crucial findings and prevents the classified documents report from being privately shared with congressional leaders. DOJ officials insist Cannon’s ruling contradicts standard DOJ practices and legal precedent.

DOJ Cites Precedents

The Justice Department highlighted past examples where special counsel reports were publicly disclosed, regardless of the administration in power. Notable cases include:

These examples, the DOJ argues, demonstrate that Cannon’s ruling is inconsistent with standard transparency expectations.

Timing Concerns

With Trump’s inauguration looming, the DOJ’s push for immediate action underscores fears that a Trump administration might block or suppress the report entirely. Trump’s return to power places allies, including his personal legal team, in key DOJ roles, raising questions about how the report would be handled post-inauguration.

The Stakes for Transparency

The DOJ’s filing emphasizes the importance of public access to Smith’s findings, particularly regarding Trump’s actions leading up to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. The department asserts that withholding the report undermines accountability and public trust.

As the appeals court reviews the DOJ’s emergency motion, the case highlights the ongoing legal and political challenges surrounding Trump’s unprecedented presidency and impending return to office.

More on US News

Previous Article
South Under Ice: Winter Storm Disrupts Power, Schools, and Flights
Next Article
Christianity in Classrooms: Trump Era Sparks Renewed Push by Conservatives

How useful was this article?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this article.

Latest News

Menu