The Onion vs. Alex Jones: Infowars Sale Disputed

9 Dec at 6:59 pm

1136 posts

The Onion vs. Alex Jones: Infowars Sale Disputed \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ The Onion’s $1.75 million bid for Alex Jones’ Infowars is under scrutiny in a Texas bankruptcy court. Jones claims fraud after his affiliate’s higher bid was rejected. Proceeds from the sale aim to compensate Sandy Hook families, following Jones’ $1.5 billion defamation judgments.

Infowars Bankruptcy Auction: Quick Looks

Courtroom Battle: Alex Jones alleges fraud in Infowars’ bankruptcy auction.
Winning Bid: The Onion offered $1.75M, beating Jones’ affiliate’s $3.5M bid.
Key Assets: Includes Infowars studio, websites, trademarks, and social accounts.
Proceeds Distribution: Sandy Hook families are the primary beneficiaries.
The Onion’s Proposal: Plans to parody Infowars; offered creditor bonuses.
Jones’ Allegations: Claims collusion between The Onion, the trustee, and families.
Legal Disputes: Judge to determine if the auction process was fair.
Appeals Continue: Jones is appealing $1.5 billion in defamation rulings.

Deep Look

Infowars Auction Sparks Legal Firestorm

The high-stakes bankruptcy auction of Alex Jones’ controversial media platform, Infowars, is under intense scrutiny as legal battles unfold in a Houston courtroom. The Onion, a satirical news outlet, emerged as the winning bidder in November with an offer of $1.75 million, edging out First United American Companies, an entity affiliated with Jones, which proposed $3.5 million. The dispute centers on trustee Christopher Murray’s decision to favor The Onion, citing its proposal’s added benefits for creditors, despite its lower monetary bid.

Jones’ Allegations of Fraud and Collusion

Jones and his company allege that The Onion, Murray, and families of the Sandy Hook victims colluded to manipulate the auction outcome. In court filings, they accuse the trustee of disregarding auction rules and favoring The Onion’s bid for reasons unrelated to the highest monetary offer. They also claim the families agreed to forgo some of their compensation to bolster The Onion’s bid.

Murray, in response, has called these allegations baseless, labeling them “fantastic, imagined conspiracy theories.” His attorney, Joshua Wolfshohl, defended the auction process in court, asserting it was conducted fairly and transparently. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez is now tasked with reviewing the claims to determine the validity of the auction process.

Proceeds to Benefit Sandy Hook Families

The sale of Infowars is part of Jones’ personal bankruptcy proceedings, initiated after he was ordered to pay nearly $1.5 billion in defamation damages to families of Sandy Hook shooting victims. Jones falsely claimed the 2012 tragedy, which killed 20 children and six educators, was a hoax aimed at promoting gun control.

Proceeds from the sale are primarily earmarked to compensate these families. Under The Onion’s proposal, an additional $100,000 would go to other creditors, supported by the families’ willingness to forgo some of their entitlements.

Infowars Assets on the Auction Block

The auction includes a wide array of assets tied to Infowars, such as studio equipment, trademarks, video archives, and social media accounts. For years, the Infowars platform has been the base for Jones’ far-right broadcasts and conspiracy-laden content.

Jones has taken measures to ensure continuity for his operations. He has set up new studios, websites, and social media accounts as a backup if The Onion’s purchase is finalized. He has also suggested he may continue using Infowars’ platforms if the winning bidder allows it.

The Onion’s Unconventional Vision

The Onion’s bid for Infowars is not only financial but deeply symbolic. The satirical news outlet has stated its intention to transform Infowars into a parody platform, using its infrastructure to lampoon the conspiracy theories and far-right narratives Jones has propagated. This vision starkly contrasts with Jones’ goal of preserving Infowars as a platform for his controversial content.

Broader Legal Context and Appeals

Jones’ legal troubles extend beyond the auction. He is appealing the $1.5 billion defamation judgments, claiming his statements about the Sandy Hook shooting are protected under free speech rights. However, he has acknowledged that the tragedy did occur, a reversal from his earlier claims.

In a recent development, a Connecticut appeals court reduced his original $1.44 billion judgment by $150 million but upheld the remainder. Jones is also appealing a $50 million Texas defamation judgment, which adds to his mounting financial and legal challenges.

Ongoing Courtroom Drama

Monday’s hearing in the Houston bankruptcy court is the latest chapter in this complex saga. Testimony from an auction company executive took up much of the proceedings, with further arguments expected to continue into Tuesday. Judge Lopez’s eventual decision will determine whether the auction results stand or if the process needs to be revisited.

Jones’ legal team has questioned the valuation of The Onion’s bid, arguing that it effectively amounts to $7 million due to the additional incentives offered to creditors. They also allege improprieties in Murray’s handling of the auction, citing depositions they claim reveal procedural flaws.

Infowars’ Future at Stake

The outcome of this legal battle will have significant implications for Infowars’ future. If The Onion’s bid is upheld, the platform will undergo a dramatic transformation into a satirical outlet. If Jones prevails, he may retain control or find a more sympathetic buyer. Either way, the sale of Infowars underscores the broader fallout from Jones’ defamation cases and his role in spreading conspiracy theories.