Tim Walz Misleads About Tiananmen Square Presence in 1989 \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz is facing backlash for allegedly misleading claims that he was in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. Public records and media reports indicate he was in Nebraska at the time. This claim is part of a pattern of inconsistencies that Republicans are leveraging during the 2024 election campaign.
Tim Walz’s Tiananmen Square Claim: Quick Looks
- Tiananmen Misrepresentation: Tim Walz claimed he was in Hong Kong during the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, but public records suggest otherwise.
- Contradictory Statements: Evidence shows Walz was in Nebraska in May 1989, contradicting his claims.
- Campaign Silence: The Harris-Walz campaign has not responded to requests for comment on the misrepresentation.
- Broader Pattern: Walz’s comments are part of a broader pattern of inaccuracies, including misleading information about his National Guard rank and family matters.
- Trips to China: Walz has claimed to have traveled to China over 30 times; the actual count is closer to 15.
- Republican Criticism: Republicans have seized on Walz’s misleading statements, criticizing his longstanding interest in China.
- Historical Accounts: A 2014 testimony by Walz inaccurately described his presence in Hong Kong during the massacre.
- Academic View: Experts suggest that focusing on opponents’ ties to China is a common political tactic.
Deep Look
Democratic vice presidential nominee and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is under fire for allegedly misleading statements about his whereabouts during the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. Multiple media reports have surfaced indicating that Walz claimed to be in Hong Kong at the time of the crackdown, but evidence contradicts this account, showing that he was actually in Nebraska. Republicans are seizing on these revelations as part of a broader pattern of inaccuracies that they hope to exploit in the 2024 election cycle.
On Tuesday, CNN unearthed a 2019 radio interview in which Walz stated that he was in Hong Kong on the day of the Tiananmen Square massacre. This claim, however, has been called into question, with publicly available evidence suggesting otherwise. The Associated Press reached out to the Harris-Walz campaign for comment but did not receive a response.
The Tiananmen Square massacre took place on June 4, 1989, when China’s military opened fire on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing, leaving at least 500 people dead. The demonstrations had lasted for over seven weeks and were led primarily by students demanding greater political freedom. Walz, who has since stated that he was in Hong Kong during that tumultuous period, appears to have been in the U.S. at the time, contradicting his public claims.
Minnesota Public Radio reported on Monday that Walz’s statements about being in Hong Kong in May 1989 did not align with available records. In a 2014 congressional hearing commemorating the 25th anniversary of the massacre, Walz claimed that as a young man, he had been in Hong Kong at the time and had traveled into China amid the protests. However, a photograph published on May 16, 1989, by a Nebraska newspaper showed Walz working at a National Guard Armory in Alliance, Nebraska. Another news story from August 11, 1989, indicated that Walz was preparing to leave for China later that month as part of a teaching program.
During the 2014 hearing, Walz testified: “As a young man I was just going to teach high school in Foshan in Guangdong province and was in Hong Kong in May 1989. As the events were unfolding, several of us went in. I still remember the train station in Hong Kong. There was a large number of people — especially Europeans, I think — very angry that we would still go after what had happened.” He described his decision to continue on to China as an effort to contribute to diplomacy “on many levels,” believing that his presence in a Chinese high school during such a crucial time was significant.
However, Minnesota Public Radio’s investigation into Walz’s whereabouts suggests that his claims were inaccurate. In May 1989, Walz was 25 years old and working in Nebraska. He eventually traveled to China that year through WorldTeach, a Harvard University-based nonprofit, but not until August — months after the massacre had already occurred.
The Associated Press also examined a 2009 congressional transcript in which Walz appeared to insinuate that he had been in Hong Kong on the day of the massacre. These statements have fueled scrutiny, particularly from his political opponents, who argue that Walz has demonstrated a pattern of misleading or exaggerating his experiences.
This isn’t the only instance where Walz’s statements have come under question. There have also been conflicting accounts of his 1995 arrest for drunk driving, along with discrepancies in the details he provided about his rank while serving in the National Guard. Walz and his campaign have provided different versions of his 1995 arrest, further complicating his public narrative. In addition, he has made misstatements about the type of infertility treatment his family received, leading to confusion and questions about his overall transparency.
Walz has also faced criticism for his comments regarding his travels to China. At various times, he has claimed to have traveled to China more than 30 times, though his campaign later clarified that the actual number was closer to 15. Some of these visits were made during his time as a teacher and later as a lawmaker, including trips for his honeymoon and with American exchange students.
A deeper look into Walz’s 2014 testimony during the congressional hearing on Tiananmen Square reveals the apparent discrepancy in his claims. Walz described himself as a young teacher venturing into China at a pivotal historical moment, a story that added an air of drama and personal involvement in one of the most consequential political events of the late 20th century. However, public records now suggest that Walz was far from China during the height of the 1989 protests.
The misleading claims have provided Republicans with ammunition in the 2024 election cycle. They argue that Walz’s statements are part of a larger pattern of exaggeration and dishonesty that voters should take into consideration. Some Republicans have also criticized Walz for his longstanding interest in China, emphasizing his multiple trips and his work teaching in the country.
Kyle Jaros, an associate professor of global affairs at the University of Notre Dame, commented on the political strategy of targeting candidates for their China ties. “It’s become a well-worn tactic to attack opponents simply for having a China line in their resumes,” Jaros told The Associated Press. He noted that such attacks often play into broader political narratives about China’s influence and American politicians’ relations with the country.
Despite the mounting criticisms, the Harris-Walz campaign has yet to formally address the questions surrounding Walz’s statements. The campaign’s silence leaves many questions unanswered, potentially fueling speculation and giving opponents more room to shape the narrative. As the 2024 election approaches, these allegations will likely continue to be a talking point, especially with the Republican ticket seeking to portray Walz as untrustworthy and lacking credibility.
The scrutiny over Walz’s past comments comes at a critical moment for the Harris-Walz campaign, as the election season heats up and both parties seek to gain an edge. The vice presidential debate, in which Walz is set to participate, could provide an opportunity for the Minnesota governor to directly address these controversies or, alternatively, give Republicans further material if he chooses to deflect or evade.
With election day looming, both sides understand the potential impact of character and credibility issues. For Walz, the challenge will be not only to clarify these inconsistencies but also to regain the trust of voters who may be questioning his narrative. Whether these issues ultimately influence voter behavior remains to be seen, but they undeniably add another layer of complexity to an already contentious election.
Tim Walz Misleads
