Top Programs Dominate Early Signing Period Amid NIL

Top Programs Dominate Early Signing Period Amid NIL \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ The early signing period reinforced the dominance of college football’s top programs, with recruiting powerhouses Georgia, Alabama, Texas, Oregon, and Ohio State securing top-tier classes. The impact of NIL opportunities and the transfer portal continues to reshape the recruiting landscape, while late flips and surprises from schools like Michigan, Oregon, and Auburn added drama to the day. Several programs saw significant momentum, further fueling their title aspirations.

Early Signing Period Highlights: Quick Looks

• Top Performers: Georgia, Alabama, and Texas secured elite recruits, bolstering College Football Playoff hopes.
• Recruiting and NIL: Programs navigated NIL deals and early commitments, underscoring shifts in recruiting dynamics.
• Late Flips: Oregon, Michigan, and Auburn capitalized on last-minute switches to strengthen their classes.
• Emerging Teams: Auburn and Florida showed surprising improvements, climbing the rankings with key signings.
• Future Stars: Bryce Underwood’s commitment to Michigan and Keelon Russell’s leadership at Alabama stood out.

Deep Look

The early signing period for college football brought a flurry of activity on Wednesday, as powerhouse programs continued to separate themselves from the pack. The recruiting successes of Georgia, Alabama, Texas, Oregon, and Ohio State reflect a clear trend in modern college football: top programs with abundant resources dominate both on the field and in recruiting, further cementing their status as perennial contenders for College Football Playoff berths.

Top Programs Strengthen Their Grip

Texas, Georgia, Alabama, Oregon, and Ohio State currently hold the top five recruiting classes, showcasing their ability to attract top talent in the era of NIL (name, image, and likeness) deals and the transfer portal. According to Steve Wiltfong, On3’s vice president of recruiting, the formula for success is clear.

“First and foremost, those are the programs with the most resources,” Wiltfong said. “They’re the programs that are having the most success on the field and in the NFL draft.”

For example, Georgia secured two of the nation’s top nine recruits: defensive lineman Elijah Griffin (No. 3) and edge rusher Isaiah Gibson (No. 9). Alabama’s class is headlined by quarterback Keelon Russell, ranked No. 2 overall, who is credited with helping to unify and lead his recruiting class.

Meanwhile, Texas kept three top-25 players in-state, including safety Jonah Williams (8th), wide receiver Kaliq Lockett (22nd), and defensive lineman Lance Jackson (25th). Ohio State landed two top-10 prospects, cornerback Devin Sanchez (6th) and quarterback Tavien St. Clair (7th), adding firepower to their future roster.

Drama at the Top

The final rankings for the early signing period remain unsettled, as several elite recruits, including Manchester (Georgia) defensive tackle Justus Terry (10th), delayed their commitments. Terry is weighing offers from Georgia, Texas, and Auburn, and his decision could reshape the final rankings.

Another prospect creating intrigue is offensive tackle David Sanders (5th), committed to Tennessee but still pursued by Ohio State. Sanders opted not to sign on Wednesday, fueling speculation about a potential flip.

Oregon’s Late Moves Pay Off

Oregon emerged as one of the biggest winners of the early signing period, flipping several key prospects. The Ducks landed cornerback Na’eem Offord, ranked No. 11 overall, who had previously committed to Ohio State. They also secured quarterback Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele, a top-10 QB recruit who had been committed to California.

The Ducks now boast three of the top six cornerback recruits in the country, including Brandon Finney and Dorian Brew. Oregon’s aggressive approach to recruiting demonstrates how programs can make waves even late in the process.

Michigan’s Momentum and Surprises Elsewhere

Defending national champion Michigan made headlines by flipping Bryce Underwood, the nation’s top quarterback recruit, from LSU last month. Underwood’s decision adds significant firepower to a Michigan class that hadn’t ranked in the top 15 in recent years.

“It’s huge,” Michigan coach Sherrone Moore said. “He’s an excellent player, obviously.”

Auburn also surprised analysts, ranking sixth overall despite four consecutive losing seasons. Head coach Hugh Freeze highlighted the importance of stacking top-10 recruiting classes to rebuild the program, saying, “Today’s one of those days where the first emotion you feel is relief, and excitement is the next one.”

Florida’s dramatic rise in the rankings—jumping from outside the top 50 to the cusp of the top 10—was another highlight. Much of the credit went to freshman quarterback DJ Lagway, whose strong finish to the season and leadership helped attract other recruits.

NIL and the Changing Landscape

This year’s recruiting cycle further highlighted the influence of NIL opportunities. LSU coach Brian Kelly remarked on the evolving priorities of recruits, noting the challenges of competing in this new environment.

“It feels more like Tax Day than Signing Day,” Kelly said. “It’s not just about academics or championships anymore. It’s about what’s the most money I can get. That’s unfortunate, but it’s the reality.”

The impact of NIL deals was particularly evident in the success of programs with strong collectives, which have become vital tools in attracting top talent.

What’s Next?

As the early signing period transitions into the traditional February signing day, the focus will remain on high-profile uncommitted recruits and potential flips. The upcoming transfer window, opening Monday, will also add another layer of complexity, as teams look to bolster their rosters further.

With elite recruiting classes, the likes of Georgia, Alabama, and Texas are positioned to remain dominant forces for years to come. Meanwhile, emerging programs like Auburn and Florida offer hope for increased parity in the future, though the gap between the top-tier programs and the rest of college football remains stark.

More on Sports