Top StoryUS

Trump Seeks SCOUTS Approval to Cut $600M Teacher-Training Funds

Trump Seeks SCOUTS Approval to Cut $600M Teacher-Training Funds/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to greenlight the elimination of over $600 million in federal teacher training programs, arguing for emergency action after lower courts blocked the move. Eight Democratic-led states claim the cuts are politically motivated and tied to Trump’s broader efforts to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in education.

President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis)

Teacher Training Cuts + Quick Look

  • What’s Happening: Trump’s administration wants to defund two key federal teacher training programs.
  • Programs Targeted: The Teacher Quality Partnership and Supporting Effective Educator Development grants.
  • Funding at Risk: Over $600 million allocated annually.
  • States Suing: California leads a coalition of eight Democratic-led states.
  • Legal Roadblock: A federal judge blocked the cuts, citing likely violations of federal law.
  • Trump’s Broader Goal: Eliminate DEI initiatives and restructure the Department of Education.
  • Current Status: Emergency appeal filed with the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Supreme Court’s Role: Asked to allow the cuts while legal battles unfold.

Trump Seeks SCOUTS Approval to Cut $600M Teacher-Training Funds

Deep Look

The Trump administration has escalated its push to cut federal education spending by appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court for emergency approval to slash over $600 million in teacher-training funds. The move is part of a sweeping plan to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education and eliminate programs that Trump officials deem to be “woke” or wasteful.

At the center of the legal fight are two federal programs: the Teacher Quality Partnership and Supporting Effective Educator Development, which fund preparation and retention efforts in high-need areas like STEM, special education, and underserved communities. These grants, according to multiple states, have led to measurable improvements in teacher performance and longevity.

A federal judge in Boston, U.S. District Judge Myong Joun, temporarily blocked the administration’s abrupt cancellation of the programs in February, arguing the decision likely violated federal requirements for policy transparency. His ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by California, joined by Massachusetts, New Jersey, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin, all arguing that the cuts were politically driven by the administration’s anti-DEI agenda.

The First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s injunction, prompting Trump’s legal team to petition the Supreme Court to intervene. The administration claims it needs immediate relief to continue reshaping federal education priorities, especially those influenced by DEI principles.

Trump’s executive order earlier this year called for dismantling the Education Department, and the administration has already cut several education contracts, claiming they were ideologically biased. The Justice Department has also filed multiple emergency appeals related to other controversial moves, including efforts to limit birthright citizenship and dismiss federal employees tied to prior administrations.

Meanwhile, supporters of the teacher-training programs warn that removing them mid-cycle will leave states without crucial resources to address teacher shortages, especially in rural and underserved districts. Data submitted in court filings show that participants in these programs are more likely to stay in the profession beyond five years, helping to stabilize schools across the country.

The Biden-appointed judges at the district and appellate levels emphasized that the sudden defunding of proven programs without adequate justification sets a dangerous precedent and undermines trust in federal education policy.

The Supreme Court has not indicated when it will decide on the emergency request, but the outcome could significantly affect both education policy and the administration’s broader campaign to eliminate DEI-related initiatives across government.


More on US News

Previous Article
U.S. Blacklists 50 Chinese Tech Firms Over Military Links
Next Article
Trump to Unveil Auto Tariffs at 4 P.M. White House News Conference

How useful was this article?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this article.

Latest News

Menu