Top StoryUS

Trump Turns to Supreme Court as Lower Judges Block Orders

Trump Turns to Supreme Court as Lower Judges Block Orders/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ President Trump is turning to the Supreme Court more frequently to counter lower court rulings blocking key parts of his agenda. The administration has made six emergency appeals in two months, challenging decisions on deportations, federal worker layoffs, and birthright citizenship.

FILE – The Supreme Court in Washington, June 30, 2024. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

Trump Turns to Supreme Court to Revive Blocked Policies: Quick Looks

  • Trump administration has filed six emergency Supreme Court appeals since January
  • Over 130 lawsuits filed against Trump’s recent executive orders
  • DOJ uses “shadow docket” to seek quick, early intervention
  • Federal judges have blocked Trump’s actions over 40 times
  • Appeals focus on deportations, birthright citizenship, DEI funding cuts
  • SCOTUS has not yet granted emergency relief this year
  • Chief Justice Roberts rebuked Trump over calls to impeach judge
  • Shadow docket strategy used successfully in Trump’s first term
  • Experts question how far justices will go to support Trump
  • Tension rising between executive orders and judicial oversight

Trump Turns to Supreme Court as Lower Judges Block Orders

Deep Look

Trump Accelerates Appeals to Supreme Court as Judges Block Key Policies

WASHINGTON — Facing a flurry of legal setbacks, President Donald Trump is leaning heavily on the U.S. Supreme Court to salvage key parts of his second-term agenda — a strategy reminiscent of his first term but now more frequent and urgent.

In just over two months since returning to the White House, Trump’s administration has filed six emergency appeals with the high court — three in the past week alone — asking justices to intervene earlier than usual in cases where lower courts have issued temporary blocks.

“Only this Court can stop rule-by-TRO from further upending the separation of powers — the sooner, the better,” wrote Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris in one of the filings, referring to temporary restraining orders.

More than 130 lawsuits have already been filed across the country targeting Trump’s executive orders on immigration, education, federal spending, and civil service reforms. Many have been filed in liberal-leaning jurisdictions, with federal judges issuing more than 40 temporary or preliminary injunctions, according to the Justice Department.

Legal experts say Trump’s strategy mirrors his successful use of the Supreme Court’s emergency docket — often called the “shadow docket” — during his first term. Back then, the administration sought emergency relief 41 times and won full or partial victories in 28 of those cases.

By contrast, the Obama and George W. Bush administrations combined made just eight such requests over 16 years.

These appeals often involve expedited timelines, limited written arguments, and typically avoid the lengthy, detailed opinions that accompany full court rulings. While the justices have not granted Trump’s emergency requests so far this year, analysts say it’s only a matter of time before a pivotal case forces their hand.

“These cases reflect the inevitable reckoning — just how much is the Supreme Court going to stand up to Trump?” asked Georgetown law professor Stephen Vladeck, author of The Shadow Docket.

1. Mass Deportations Under Rare 18th-Century Law
Trump’s executive order invoking a centuries-old wartime law to expedite deportations of Venezuelan migrants suspected of gang ties has drawn widespread scrutiny. A federal judge blocked the move and ordered flights already en route to be turned around — a ruling the administration is now challenging at the Supreme Court.

2. Federal Worker Firings and Downsizing
Thousands of federal employees — especially probationary workers — have been fired as part of Trump’s effort to shrink the federal workforce. After courts ordered the reinstatement of 16,000 workers, citing illegal firings and misrepresentation, the Justice Department appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing judges should not dictate hiring and firing decisions.

3. Cuts to DEI-Aligned Teacher Training
Trump’s executive actions to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies included slashing funding for teacher training. Eight states sued, and a judge blocked the cuts, citing damage to ongoing efforts to address the national teacher shortage. The DOJ is asking the Supreme Court to lift that block.

4. Birthright Citizenship Restrictions
In one of his most controversial moves, Trump signed an order denying birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants. Multiple courts immediately blocked the measure. Rather than challenge the rulings head-on, the administration is asking the Supreme Court to limit the scope of the injunctions so they apply only to the plaintiffs.

This taps into a broader conservative legal argument that district court judges should not issue nationwide injunctions — a view shared by several justices in past opinions.

Supreme Court’s Conservative Majority Under Pressure

With three Trump-appointed justices on the bench, the Court’s 6–3 conservative majority is being closely watched for signs of how it will handle the president’s increasingly aggressive legal strategy.

Tensions have already surfaced. Earlier this month, Trump called for the impeachment of a judge who ruled against him in a deportation case — prompting a rare public rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts, who defended judicial independence.

Legal observers note that the Court is now being asked not just to decide complex legal issues, but to act as a political backstop for a president frequently at odds with judicial authority.

What Comes Next?

As legal battles escalate, so does Trump’s reliance on the Supreme Court to keep his agenda intact. Each emergency appeal represents both a legal maneuver and a political signal — reinforcing Trump’s efforts to portray courts as obstructing the will of the people.

Whether the justices intervene — and how they do so — could shape the next phase of Trump’s presidency and redefine the balance between the branches of government.


More on US News

Previous Article
‘Tesla Takedown’ Sparks Worldwide Protests Against Elon Musk
Next Article
Myanmar Ceasefire Declared to Support Earthquake Relief

How useful was this article?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this article.

Latest News

Menu