Trump White House official Peter Navarro, who was convicted of contempt of Congress for refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, was sentenced on Thursday to four months behind bars
Quick Read
Key Points of Peter Navarro’s Sentencing:
- Sentenced to Four Months: Peter Navarro, former Trump White House official, was sentenced to four months in prison for contempt of Congress.
- Refusal to Cooperate with Jan. 6 Investigation: Navarro was convicted for defying a subpoena from the House Jan. 6 committee seeking documents and a deposition.
- Claim of Executive Privilege: Navarro’s defense was based on the claim that he couldn’t cooperate due to executive privilege invoked by Trump, a claim the judge found unsubstantiated.
- Navarro’s Position in Court: In court, Navarro expressed that he believed the Jan. 6 committee accepted his invocation of executive privilege, stating a conflict between the legislative and executive branches.
- Judge’s Response: The judge criticized Navarro for suggesting his prosecution was politically motivated, emphasizing that Navarro’s situation was of his own making.
- Prosecution’s Argument: The Justice Department argued that Navarro attempted to use privilege claims to avoid compliance, demonstrating contempt for the committee.
- Appeal Plans: Navarro plans to appeal the verdict and may submit a brief on the possibility of remaining free during the appeal process.
- Prosecutors’ Sentencing Request: Prosecutors initially requested a six-month sentence and a $200,000 fine.
- Defense’s Sentencing Request: The defense asked for probation and a $100 fine, citing Trump’s executive privilege claim.
- Comparison to Steve Bannon’s Case: Navarro is the second Trump aide convicted of contempt of Congress, following Steve Bannon, who also received a four-month sentence but is free pending appeal.
- Bid for New Trial Rejected: A judge dismissed Navarro’s request for a new trial, which was based on concerns about jury influence from external factors.
- Context of Conviction: Navarro’s conviction stems from his refusal to comply with the House Jan. 6 committee investigating the Capitol attack and his promotion of false claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election.
Peter Navarro’s sentencing highlights the ongoing legal repercussions for individuals involved in disputing the 2020 presidential election results and the subsequent events of January 6, 2021.
The Associated Press has the story:
Trump WH official Peter Navarro gets a 4-month sentence for defying a House Jan. 6 subpoena
Newslooks- WASHINGTON (AP) —
Trump White House official Peter Navarro, who was convicted of contempt of Congress for refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, was sentenced on Thursday to four months behind bars.
He was the second Trump aide convicted of contempt of Congress charges, after former White House adviser Steve Bannon, who also got a four-month sentence but is free pending appeal.
Navarro was found guilty of defying a subpoena for documents and a deposition from the House Jan. 6 committee. He served as a White House trade adviser under then-President Donald Trump and later promoted the Republican’s baseless claims of mass voter fraud in the 2020 election he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.
He has vowed to appeal the verdict, saying he couldn’t cooperate with the committee because Trump had invoked executive privilege. A judge barred him from making that argument at trial, however, finding that he didn’t show Trump had actually invoked it.
Navarro said in court before his sentencing Thursday that the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack had led him to believe that it accepted his invocation of executive privilege. “Nobody in my position should be put in conflict between the legislative branch and the executive branch,” he told the judge.
The judge told Navarro that it took “chutzpah” for him to assert that he accepted responsibility for his actions while also suggesting that his prosecution was politically motivated. “You are not a victim. You are not the object of a political prosecution,” the judge said. “These are circumstances of your own making.
Navarro’s lawyers had advised him not to address the judge, but he said he wanted to speak after hearing the judge express disappointment in him. Responding to a question about why he didn’t initially seek a lawyer’s counsel, he told the judge, “I didn’t know what to do, sir.”
The judge is allowing Navarro’s defense to submit a written brief on the question of allowing him to remain free pending appeal.
Justice Department prosecutors said Navarro tried to “hide behind claims of privilege” even before he knew what the committee wanted, showing a “disdain” for the committee that should warrant a longer sentence. Prosecutors had asked a judge to sentence him to six months behind bars and impose a $200,000 fine.
Defense attorneys said Trump did claim executive privilege, putting Navarro in an “untenable position,” and they asked for a sentence of probation and a $100 fine.
Bannon, who also made executive-privilege arguments, was convicted of two counts.
Navarro’s sentencing comes after a judge rejected his bid for a new trial. His attorneys had argued that jurors may have been improperly influenced by political protesters outside the courthouse when they took a break from deliberations. Shortly after their break, the jurors found Navarro guilty of two misdemeanor counts of contempt of Congress.
But U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta found that Navarro didn’t show that the eight-minute break had any effect on the September verdict. He found no protest was underway and no one approached the jurors — they interacted only with each other and the court officer assigned to accompany them.
