Donald Trump’s defense team in his hush money case sought Friday to undermine the testimony of the prosecution’s lead witness and his account that a tabloid’s practice of helping to bury embarrassing stories about Trump was part of a scheme to aid the Republican’s 2016 campaig
Quick Read
- Defense Strategy: Donald Trump’s defense team sought to undermine the testimony of David Pecker, former publisher of the National Enquirer, by questioning his memory and past statements. Their aim is to challenge the credibility of what is a crucial testimony for the prosecution.
- Pecker’s Testimony: Pecker has provided detailed insights into the “catch-and-kill” practice used by the National Enquirer to suppress stories, a method prosecutors argue was used to illegally influence the 2016 election in favor of Trump.
- Focus on Intent: Trump’s lawyers are trying to demonstrate that any interactions with Pecker were intended to protect Trump’s personal and family reputation, rather than specifically to influence his campaign.
- Discussions of “Catch-and-Kill”: During cross-examination, Pecker confirmed that there was no specific mention of “catch-and-kill” or financial arrangements related to it at a key 2015 meeting with Trump and Michael Cohen.
- Inconsistencies Highlighted: The defense pointed out inconsistencies in Pecker’s statements to federal prosecutors in 2018 compared to his current testimony, particularly regarding whether Trump expressed gratitude for Pecker’s help during a White House visit.
- Supreme Court Implications: Concurrently, the Supreme Court seems likely to reject Trump’s claims of presidential immunity from prosecution related to his 2020 election interference case, which could influence the timing of that trial.
- Charges and Denials: In this trial, Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to $130,000 in payments meant to prevent Stormy Daniels from publicizing an alleged sexual encounter with him, which he denies.
- Trial’s Broader Context: This trial is just one of multiple legal battles Trump faces as he attempts a political comeback, with ongoing implications for his eligibility in the upcoming presidential election.
The Associated Press has the story:
Trump’s lawyers try to discredit testimony of prosecution’s lead witness in hush money trial
Newslooks- NEW YORK (AP) —
Donald Trump‘s defense team in his hush money case sought Friday to undermine the testimony of the prosecution’s lead witness and his account that a tabloid’s practice of helping to bury embarrassing stories about Trump was part of a scheme to aid the Republican’s 2016 campaign.
Returning to the witness stand for a fourth day, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker was grilled about his memory and past statements as the defense tried to poke holes in potentially crucial testimony for prosecutors in the first criminal trial of a former American president.
Pecker’s testimony has provided jurors with a stunning inside look at the supermarket tabloid’s “catch-and-kill” practice of purchasing the rights to stories so they never see the light of day. It’s a critical building block for prosecutors’ theory that Trump sought to illegally influence the 2016 race by suppressing negative stories about his personal life.
Under cross-examination, Trump’s lawyers appeared to be laying the groundwork to make the argument that any dealings Trump had with Pecker were intended to protect Trump, his reputation and his family — not his campaign.
The defense also sought to show that the tabloid was publishing negative stories about Trump’s 2016 rival, Hillary Clinton, long before the August 2015 meeting between Trump, Pecker and then-Trump attorney Michael Cohen. Pecker said that’s when he agreed to help Trump’s campaign.
Under questioning by Trump lawyer Emil Bove, Pecker acknowledged there was no mention at that meeting of the term “catch-and-kill.” Nor was there discussion at the meeting of any “financial dimension,” such as the National Enquirer paying people on Trump’s behalf for the rights to their stories, Pecker said.
Bove also confronted Pecker with statements he made to federal prosecutors in 2018 that the defense lawyer said were “inconsistent” with the former publisher’s testimony.
Pecker told jurors that Trump thanked him during a White House visit in 2017 for his help burying two stories. But according to notes Bove read in court, Pecker told federal authorities that Trump did not express any gratitude to him during the meeting.
“Was that another mistake?” Bove asked Pecker.
Pecker stuck to the account that he gave in court, adding: “I know what the truth is.”
As Bove wrapped up his cross-examination Friday afternoon, Pecker told jurors: “I’ve been truthful, to the best of my recollection.”
His testimony caps a consequential week in the criminal cases the former president faces as he vies to reclaim the White House in November.
At the same time jurors listened to testimony in Manhattan, the Supreme Court on Thursday signaled it was likely to reject Trump’s sweeping claims that he is immune from prosecution in his 2020 election interference case in Washington. But the conservative-majority high court seemed inclined to limit when former presidents could be prosecuted — a ruling that could benefit Trump by delaying that trial, potentially until after the November election.
In New York — the first of Trump’s four criminal cases to go to trial — the presumptive Republican presidential nominee faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in connection with hush money payments meant to stifle negative stories from surfacing in the final days of the 2016 campaign.
Trump denies any wrongdoing. Before entering the courtroom Friday, he told reporters he believes Thursday’s proceedings went “very well” for the defense, adding that “the case should be over.”
The charges center on $130,000 in payments that Trump’s company made to Cohen. He paid that sum on Trump’s behalf to keep porn actor Stormy Daniels from going public with her claims of a sexual encounter with Trump a decade earlier. Trump has denied the encounter ever happened.
Over several days on the witness stand, Pecker described how the tabloid parlayed rumor-mongering into splashy stories that smeared Trump’s opponents and, just as crucially, leveraged his connections to suppress seamy stories about Trump.
Trump’s attorney zeroed in on a nonprosecution agreement in 2018 between the federal government and American Media Inc., the parent company of the National Enquirer.
The company admitted to engaging in the “catch-and-kill” practice to help Trump’s campaign, and prosecutors agreed to not prosecute the company for paying $150,000 to Playboy model Karen McDougal for the rights to her story about an alleged affair with Trump. He denies the affair.
Trump’s attorney repeatedly suggested that Pecker may have felt pressured to accept an agreement in order to finalize a deal to sell his company to the newsstand operator Hudson News Group for a proposed $100 million.
“To consummate that deal, you knew you had to clear up the investigations,” Bove said.
After pausing for several seconds, Pecker replied in the affirmative. But Pecker also said he felt “no pressure” to finalize the nonprosecution agreement to complete the transaction.
In the end, the deal didn’t go through.
