Trump military plans/ border security/ National Guard/ U.S.-Mexico border/ 2024 election/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ In his 2024 campaign, Donald Trump has outlined plans to increase the military’s role within U.S. borders, including deploying troops to the Mexico border, using the National Guard for mass deportations, and confronting civil unrest. His proposals mark an expansion of domestic military use, drawing both support and alarm.
Trump’s Domestic Military Plans: Expanded Role for U.S. Troops at Border and Beyond: Quick Looks
- Border Deployment: Trump proposes relocating thousands of troops to the U.S.-Mexico border.
- Use Against Unrest: He suggests using the National Guard and possibly the military for domestic “enemies.”
- Bipartisan Reaction: Republicans support, while Democrats warn of potential misuse of military powers.
- Military Restructuring: Trump aims to replace officers not aligned with his vision.
- Campaign Platform: Trump’s “Agenda 47” includes a proposed blockade of cartel ships carrying fentanyl.
Trump’s Second-Term Vision: Expanded Military Role at Home
Deep Look
As Donald Trump campaigns for a potential second term, he has outlined unprecedented plans to increase the military’s role within the United States, envisioning a force restructured to address border security and domestic unrest. Trump’s platform, known as “Agenda 47,” includes stationing thousands of troops along the U.S.-Mexico border, overseeing mass deportations, and, if necessary, deploying the National Guard and the military against what he calls “the enemy from within.”
Trump, whose first term saw him frequently pushing the boundaries of presidential power, has now laid out his ambition for a more forceful domestic military role. Speaking in Prescott Valley, Arizona, he stated that cities and towns across the U.S. need rescue from what he describes as crime and “invasion” by non-citizens. At a recent rally, he used the term “war zone” to describe areas affected by illegal immigration and said that drastic measures were necessary to “reclaim” these areas.
In an interview aired on Fox News, Trump underscored his perspective by discussing “the enemy from within,” whom he claims includes “radical left lunatics.” He has stated that such threats could be “handled” by the National Guard or, if necessary, by active-duty military forces. While the U.S. has historically limited domestic military engagement, Trump’s statements hint at a significant expansion.
Priorities in “Agenda 47”
One of Trump’s main goals, if re-elected, is to withdraw troops from overseas and deploy them to the U.S.-Mexico border. Trump has also pledged to “declare war” on Mexican drug cartels, planning a Navy blockade to intercept fentanyl shipments and other illicit cargoes suspected of being cartel-linked. His allies have indicated that such an effort would entail coordination between the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Justice, marking an unprecedented level of federal agency collaboration.
Ron Vitiello, former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement under Trump, spoke of the need for a unified federal approach. “There could be an alliance of the Justice Department, Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense,” Vitiello said, envisioning a coalition that could dramatically change how the military is used at the border.
These measures have drawn both approval and apprehension. Representative Joe Wilson, R-S.C., supports Trump’s proposed military presence on the border, arguing it is essential to securing the country. Conversely, Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, believes any border operations should be led by Homeland Security rather than the military.
Civil Liberties and Human Rights Concerns
Civil rights advocates are troubled by Trump’s stated plans, particularly regarding the use of the military to conduct mass deportations. Todd Schulte, president of the immigration advocacy group FWD.us, described Trump’s proposals as reminiscent of “some of the worst actions in our country’s history.” Trump’s emphasis on “rooting out” officers with differing views raises concerns about political motivations overriding military standards and training.
These concerns are shared by some in Congress. Senator Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., who previously introduced legislation to limit presidential power under the Insurrection Act, expressed alarm at Trump’s stance. “Trump’s plans misunderstand the U.S. military as a force for defense, not for political leverage,” he said.
Yet, many Republicans have embraced the idea of using the military against domestic issues, particularly illegal immigration. “Whatever fixes the border, I think we’re OK with,” said Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, underscoring a shift in GOP comfort with an expanded military role on U.S. soil.
The Insurrection Act and Domestic Military Use
Trump’s proposals to deploy the military domestically could require invoking historic emergency powers, such as the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th-century law that allows for action against foreign nationals in times of war, or the Insurrection Act, last used in 1992 during the Los Angeles riots. Trump sought to use the Insurrection Act during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, but his request met with resistance from then-Gen. Mark Milley and other military leaders, who emphasized the need to uphold the Constitution and refrain from excessive force.
Should Trump win in 2024, he would face fewer institutional barriers, as recent Supreme Court rulings have given the executive branch more leeway. Trump’s campaign team has hinted at a desire to overhaul the Pentagon and remove officials and officers who oppose his methods, allowing him greater freedom in directing military efforts toward his goals.
Expanding Border Enforcement
Trump’s border proposals aim to escalate the military’s involvement in combating illegal immigration, including mass deportations and arresting individuals at the border without proper legal status. During his first term, Trump faced criticism for policies such as family separation, in which children were separated from their parents at the border as a deterrent against illegal crossings. His new plan would potentially allow military assets to assist immigration enforcement on an even larger scale.
This stance has drawn support from Republicans who see illegal immigration as an ongoing national crisis. “This is an invasion,” stated Sen. Ted Budd, R-N.C., citing the millions who have entered the U.S. illegally in recent years.
Campaign Momentum and National Security
Trump’s campaign rhetoric and aggressive stance on the military’s domestic role appear to resonate with a segment of voters concerned with border security, crime, and national safety. As the general election approaches, Trump’s vision for the military has become a cornerstone of his campaign platform, with his supporters praising his “America First” approach.
With national security and immigration at the forefront of his platform, Trump’s promises to use the military within U.S. borders signify an unprecedented shift in how presidential power and the military’s role could be interpreted in domestic affairs. These plans may continue to shape debate over the executive branch’s authority, military independence, and civil liberties, especially in a rapidly evolving political landscape.
