Turkish Tufts Student Detained by Federal Agents Without Charges \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish Ph.D. student at Tufts University, was detained by federal agents without charges or explanation. The incident was caught on surveillance video and has prompted legal action and widespread concern. The case may involve broader visa policies affecting pro-Palestinian voices.
Turkish Tufts Student Detained by Federal Agents: Quick Looks
- Rumeysa Ozturk, 30, detained by DHS agents in Somerville, MA
- No charges filed; lawyer and university unaware of reasons
- Surveillance video shows agents in unmarked vehicles with faces covered
- Arrest happened while Ozturk was en route to a Ramadan iftar
- U.S. District Judge issued an order seeking explanation by Friday
- Tufts confirmed Ozturk is a doctoral student; visa reportedly revoked
- Ozturk co-authored op-ed criticizing Israel, cited by Canary Mission
- Concerns rise over targeted visa revocations for pro-Palestinian expression
- Ozturk is a former Fulbright scholar with a Columbia master’s degree
- Friends and professors describe her as peaceful, focused, and non-political
Deep Look
Turkish Ph.D. Student at Tufts Detained by Federal Agents, Prompting Outcry Over Free Speech, Visa Rights
The sudden and unexplained detention of Turkish national Rumeysa Ozturk, a doctoral student at Tufts University, has sparked deep concern within academic, legal, and immigrant rights communities. Her arrest—carried out by U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents in unmarked vehicles, with their faces obscured—was captured on surveillance video, leading to growing questions about due process, freedom of expression, and the use of immigration law as a tool for political suppression.
A Peaceful Evening Interrupted
On Tuesday evening, March 19, Ozturk was leaving her home in Somerville, Massachusetts, to join friends for iftar, the traditional meal breaking the daily fast during Ramadan. According to her attorney, Mahsa Khanbabai, she never made it to the gathering. Instead, surveillance footage shows six individuals surrounding Ozturk, taking her phone, and handcuffing her as she yells for help. Despite identifying themselves only as “the police,” the men were not in uniform and concealed their identities with masks. A bystander is heard asking, “Why are you hiding your faces?”—a chilling moment in a scene that neighbors say resembled a kidnapping.
“It looked like a kidnapping,” said Michael Mathis, a local resident and software engineer whose security camera recorded the event. “They were in unmarked vehicles and covered their faces. It was alarming.”
The arrest took place around 5:30 p.m. on a residential street, raising further concern about the secrecy and nature of the operation. Ozturk has not been formally charged with any crime, and DHS has not provided any official explanation for her detention. Her lawyer says she remains in custody, her location undisclosed, and communications with her have been blocked.
Judicial Intervention and Visa Termination
The case quickly escalated to federal court. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued an emergency order requiring the government to explain Ozturk’s detention by Friday. The order also prohibits her removal from the District of Massachusetts without at least 48 hours’ notice, a precaution often taken in high-risk immigration cases where deportation could be imminent.
Adding to the confusion, Tufts University released a statement Wednesday morning confirming that federal authorities had detained an international graduate student and that the student’s visa had been revoked. Tufts President Sunil Kumar emphasized that the university had no prior knowledge of the incident and did not share any information with federal officials.
Although the university initially withheld the student’s name, Tufts spokesperson Patrick Collins confirmed that Ozturk is enrolled in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences and is the individual in question.
A Student, a Scholar, and a Target?
Rumeysa Ozturk is not a newcomer to academia. Prior to Tufts, she earned her master’s degree in Developmental Psychology from Columbia University’s Teachers College, where she also served as a 2018 Fulbright Scholar. Her academic focus has been on the intersection of children’s media and cognitive development. Described by colleagues as thoughtful, reserved, and deeply committed to research, Ozturk has no known history of criminal activity or disciplinary issues.
“She’s a soft-spoken, kind, and gentle soul,” said Reyyan Bilge, a psychology professor at Northeastern University who has worked closely with Ozturk for over a decade. “She’s deeply invested in her work, not activism.”
Yet Ozturk’s name came under scrutiny last year when she co-authored an op-ed in The Tufts Daily, alongside three other graduate students. The piece criticized the university’s muted response to student government resolutions demanding Tufts acknowledge what the students referred to as the “Palestinian genocide,” disclose investments, and divest from companies with ties to Israel. The op-ed argued that these resolutions were part of legitimate political discourse and called for institutional accountability.
After the piece was published, Ozturk was listed on Canary Mission, a controversial website that compiles online dossiers of students, academics, and activists it accuses of being anti-Israel or antisemitic. The only cited instance of Ozturk’s so-called “anti-Israel activism” was the Tufts op-ed.
This connection has raised questions about whether her visa revocation and detention are part of a growing pattern of punitive immigration enforcement against foreign nationals who express pro-Palestinian views—a concern echoed by civil liberties organizations and immigration attorneys.
Political Speech and the Weaponization of Immigration Law
Under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the U.S. Secretary of State or Homeland Security has broad authority to revoke visas of non-citizens deemed threats to U.S. foreign policy interests. Though rarely used in the past, this provision was increasingly invoked during the Trump administration to deny entry or revoke visas of individuals based on political expression, particularly those connected to Muslim-majority countries or critical of U.S. allies like Israel.
In recent months, reports have emerged of foreign students and scholars—particularly those who support Palestinian rights—being denied entry or abruptly removed from the U.S., even in the absence of criminal charges. Ozturk’s detention may now be the most high-profile example yet of that trend.
Legal analysts warn that this practice, if left unchecked, could create a chilling effect on academic speech and international collaboration, as students from abroad may fear that voicing political opinions could put their immigration status at risk.
“It’s a dangerous path,” said Khanbabai. “If international students can be disappeared off the street without explanation, what does that say about our commitment to freedom of speech and due process?”
What Happens Next?
As the legal deadline nears, pressure is mounting on DHS and ICE to disclose the basis for Ozturk’s detention. Advocacy groups, faculty at Tufts and Columbia, and immigrant rights organizations are monitoring the case closely. Some have begun organizing petitions and statements of support demanding transparency and Ozturk’s release.
So far, neither DHS nor Immigration and Customs Enforcement have responded to media requests for comment. For now, Ozturk remains in custody—her voice silenced, her academic work interrupted, and her future in limbo.
Her case is becoming a flashpoint in an ongoing debate about the boundaries of national security, the treatment of international students, and the cost of political dissent on American campuses. In the absence of charges or clear justification, her detention raises unsettling questions about whose voices are being silenced—and why.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.