U.S. and South Korea Urge China to Halt Russia-North Korea Ties

U.S. and South Korea Urge China to Halt Russia-North Korea Ties \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ The U.S. and South Korea are urging China to leverage its influence over North Korea and Russia, aiming to prevent further escalation after North Korea deployed thousands of troops to Russia’s border with Ukraine. Despite international concerns, China has so far refrained from public comment, balancing its “no limits” partnership with Russia against concerns over regional stability.

U.S. and South Korea Urge China to Intervene as North Korea Sends Troops to Aid Russia

• China’s Role Under Scrutiny: The U.S. and South Korea are calling on China to use its influence with North Korea and Russia to reduce tensions after North Korean troops arrived in Russia to support its efforts against Ukraine.
• U.S.-China Diplomatic Meeting: U.S. diplomats met with China’s ambassador in Washington to communicate their concerns, emphasizing China’s potential role in de-escalating the situation.
• Chinese Response: China has avoided public comment but reiterated its stance on promoting peace talks for Ukraine. Analysts speculate China may be wary of this development given its impact on regional stability.
• Regional Implications: Experts suggest China’s silence reflects its balancing act between supporting Moscow and avoiding alienation from Western nations, given Beijing’s interest in a stable Korean Peninsula.

Deep Look

In an effort to contain escalating global tensions, the United States and South Korea have formally urged China to exercise its influence over Russia and North Korea, following reports that Pyongyang has sent thousands of troops to support Moscow’s war in Ukraine. With 8,000 North Korean soldiers reportedly stationed near the Ukraine border, the U.S. and South Korea have ramped up diplomatic efforts to press Beijing into action. The high-stakes discussions reflect the growing complexity of China’s position as it balances alliances in the region and international expectations for stability.

During a rare and strategic meeting earlier this week, three senior U.S. diplomats met with China’s ambassador to Washington, Xie Feng, to stress the U.S.’s concerns over North Korea’s expanding cooperation with Russia. This request underscores a shift in regional dynamics, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken later describing the dialogue as a “robust conversation.” According to a State Department official, the U.S. emphasized the critical role that China could play in urging North Korea to avoid further entrenchment in Russia’s military operations.

In comments made at a joint news conference with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and South Korean counterparts, Blinken shared that global expectations extend beyond U.S. diplomacy, noting that “a demand signal” is emerging from various countries around the world. He stressed that nations are looking to China to use its leverage with North Korea to maintain stability.

China, for its part, has avoided direct commentary on the North Korean deployment, instead maintaining its “consistent and clear” stance on seeking peaceful political resolutions in Ukraine, according to Chinese Embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu. In a recent statement, Liu reinforced China’s position of favoring “peace talks and a political settlement” rather than further conflict escalation.

Beijing’s longstanding “no limits” partnership with Moscow and its role as a key ally to North Korea complicate the situation. Analysts have noted China’s discomfort with closer military ties between North Korea and Russia, with experts suggesting that China views the alliance as destabilizing to its interests in the region. “The Russia-North Korea partnership runs contrary to Beijing’s goal for a peaceful Korean Peninsula,” said Shi Yinhong, a professor of international relations at Renmin University in China. Shi interprets China’s silence as a tacit disapproval of the military relationship, suggesting that Beijing may be unwilling to align too closely with Pyongyang’s increased aggression.

Dennis Wilder, a senior fellow at Georgetown University, described Beijing’s “radio silence” on the matter as “staggering,” interpreting it as part of China’s attempt to walk a fine line between supporting Russia and avoiding conflict with Western nations. He pointed out that while Chinese President Xi Jinping has cultivated a strong relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin, he must also consider the economic and diplomatic repercussions of alienating Europe and the United States, particularly as China navigates domestic economic challenges. “Xi cannot afford to see Putin fail,” Wilder said, but added that “he’s also unlikely to antagonize Europe and the U.S. over this.”

The implications of North Korea’s military involvement for the Korean Peninsula add to the stakes. Victor Cha, a Korea expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, suggested that China may be grappling with internal uncertainty regarding how to address the North Korea-Russia partnership. He noted that Beijing likely feels both frustrated and concerned about Russia’s influence over North Korea, possibly fearing that Moscow’s growing role could undermine China’s authority in the region. “There’s a mix of exasperation and panic in Beijing,” Cha noted, while adding that it’s unclear if China was informed of Pyongyang’s military deployment in advance.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin echoed these sentiments, stating that China should be “asking Russia some hard questions” about its intentions to expand the conflict. His comments reinforce the U.S. message that China has a responsibility to address the growing regional implications of its strategic relationships with both Russia and North Korea.

The high-level meetings between the U.S. and China included Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Dan Kritenbrink, and Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs James O’Brien, who met with Chinese envoy Xie Feng in Washington. Although details of the Chinese response were not disclosed, a State Department official emphasized that the talks were intended to impress upon China the urgency of acting as a stabilizing force.

In response, Lu Chao, a director at Liaoning University’s Institute of American and East Asian Studies, argued that China should not be expected to “manage North Korea” for the West. “It’s not China’s responsibility to manage North Korea in the way the U.S. manages South Korea,” he said, adding that the troop deployment is ultimately “a matter between Russia and North Korea.”

Despite Lu’s assertion, international observers continue to monitor China’s position closely, especially as Beijing’s reticence could signal a reluctance to fully support North Korea’s growing alignment with Russia. As China navigates its relationships with these two allies, experts predict that Beijing may prioritize regional stability and downplay the developments publicly to avoid drawing negative reactions from both Western powers and its domestic audience.

While China’s position remains opaque, the situation underscores the challenges of maintaining diplomatic balance in a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape. With Russia and North Korea forging closer military ties, and the U.S. and South Korea strengthening their own alliances, China’s influence is under scrutiny as it faces pressure to clarify its role in managing the dynamics of the conflict. The current standoff poses a complex dilemma for China as it attempts to reconcile its strategic partnerships with Russia and North Korea against its long-term interest in regional stability.

As the situation unfolds, China’s approach—or lack thereof—will remain a focal point of international attention, particularly among U.S. allies anxious to see how Beijing will address or respond to the ongoing escalation in the region.

More on World News