Vance Defends Trump Admin After ‘Error’ Deports a Man to El Salvador Prison/ Newooslooks/ Vice President JD Vance is defending the Trump administration after it mistakenly deported a Salvadoran man with protected legal status to a high-security prison. Critics say the administration misidentified migrants as gang members based on tattoos. Vance insists focus should remain on victims of gang violence, not immigration errors.
JD Vance on Deportation Error + Quick Looks
- Trump administration admits it mistakenly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had protected status.
- Garcia was sent to El Salvador’s megaprison despite no gang conviction.
- JD Vance doubled down, saying critics ignore victims of gang violence.
- Migrants were allegedly labeled gang members based on tattoos, including non-gang symbols.
- U.S. court filing says Garcia came to U.S. at 16, fled gang threats.
- A judge granted him protection in 2019, citing threat of persecution if deported.
- Vance disputes Garcia’s innocence, citing MS-13 allegations.
- U.S. courts may lack jurisdiction to order Garcia’s return.
Vance Defends Trump Admin After Deporting a Man by ‘Error’ to El Salvador Prison
Deep Look
Vice President JD Vance is doubling down in support of the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement, even after federal attorneys admitted to mistakenly deporting a man with legal protections to a high-security prison in El Salvador. The incident, first reported by The Atlantic, has raised concerns about due process, misidentification, and the administration’s method of labeling migrants as gang-affiliated.
The man at the center of the controversy, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, was removed from Maryland on March 15, 2025, and sent to El Salvador’s notorious “Terrorism Confinement Center.” He was among several Salvadoran and Venezuelan migrants deported that day on accusations of gang involvement. However, court filings now reveal Garcia was granted legal protections years ago after fleeing gang violence in his home country.
Garcia arrived in the United States in 2011 at just 16 years old, seeking asylum after gang threats in El Salvador. In 2019, an immigration judge granted him “withholding of removal” status—protection designed to prevent deportation to a country where someone is likely to face persecution. Despite this, he was removed under a broad crackdown that critics say used questionable standards to identify gang members.
Administration officials, including those at the Department of Homeland Security, continue to defend the removals. They argue that the individuals sent to El Salvador were “the worst of the worst.” However, immigration attorneys and human rights advocates argue that these claims rest on superficial indicators—such as tattoos.
Several removed migrants were reportedly labeled gang members due to their tattoos, even when those tattoos lacked clear gang affiliations. Among the designs flagged by immigration officials were a crown and Michael Jordan’s iconic “Jumpman” logo—hardly definitive gang symbols. Despite this, officials maintain that such tattoos have known gang associations in El Salvador and Venezuela.
When asked about the administration’s admission that Garcia had been deported in error, Vice President JD Vance didn’t walk back his support. Instead, he focused on what he described as misplaced outrage.
“My further comment is that it’s gross to get fired up about gang members getting deported while ignoring citizens they victimize,” Vance posted on X, formerly Twitter, in response to former Obama speechwriter and Pod Save America host Jon Favreau.
In the same post, Vance claimed Garcia had no legal right to remain in the U.S., citing a court filing that referenced allegations of MS-13 gang membership. However, those allegations came from a 2019 bond hearing based on an informant’s report—Garcia has not been convicted of any gang-related crimes.
The Trump administration’s attorneys now argue that U.S. courts don’t have jurisdiction to order Garcia’s return from the Salvadoran prison, where he remains detained. The filing has intensified scrutiny over the administration’s deportation policies and the lack of oversight surrounding removals.
The situation is especially complex given the political climate. The Trump administration has resumed high-profile deportations, with public support from Vice President Vance and key figures like South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, who announced the continuation of border wall construction.
Meanwhile, Garcia’s case is drawing attention from immigration advocacy groups and legal experts who argue that protected migrants should not be subjected to blanket deportations based on unreliable or non-gang-related indicators.
Vance, however, remains unapologetic. “You apparently didn’t read he was a convicted MS-13 gang member,” he wrote, even though court filings specify Garcia was denied bond based on an accusation, not a conviction.
The debate continues to highlight a broader rift in American immigration politics—between those who advocate for aggressive enforcement at all costs and those who emphasize due process and legal protections for vulnerable individuals.
As legal challenges unfold and public debate grows louder, the spotlight remains on whether the Trump administration will face accountability for the mistake—and whether the courts will intervene in a case that could define how far U.S. executive power can go in deportation decisions.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.