Kamala Harris endorsement/ New York Times presidential endorsement/ 2024 election/ NYT says Donald Trump unfit for presidency/ Harris vs Trump/ Harris 2024 endorsement/ New York Times endorses Kamala Harris/ 2024 presidential endorsement/ Newslooks/ NEW YORK/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ The New York Times officially endorses Kamala Harris for president, citing her dedication to the Constitution, public service, and policy focus. In contrast, Donald Trump is deemed unfit for office due to his legal troubles, disdain for democratic norms, and failure to uphold presidential qualities. The paper calls Harris the only patriotic choice for a stable future.
New York Times Endorses Harris for President Quick Looks
- Trump Unfit for Office: The Times criticizes Donald Trump’s criminal charges, temperament, and disdain for democratic norms.
- Kamala Harris Endorsement: Harris is praised for her constitutional commitment and policy focus on helping American families.
- Key Issues: Harris is endorsed for her stance on healthcare, the economy, and global alliances, while Trump’s policies are described as destructive.
- Electoral Importance: The endorsement stresses the threat of a second Trump term, urging voters to choose Harris for stability and progress.
Why The New York Times Endorses Harris, Rejects Trump in 2024
Deep Look
In its latest presidential endorsement, The New York Times declared Kamala Harris as the best choice for the future of the United States, offering a stark and unequivocal critique of her opponent, Donald Trump. The paper’s decision rests not only on its firm belief in Harris’s competency and vision but also on its assessment that Trump is fundamentally unfit to serve as president again.
The Times editorial board argues that Donald Trump has repeatedly shown that he lacks the moral and ethical character required for the highest office in the land. The list of Trump’s disqualifying traits is extensive, but his alleged criminal actions and legal troubles, including numerous felony charges and civil court liabilities, top the board’s concerns. His temperament, which often veers toward impulsiveness and self-interest, is also at odds with the qualities a president should embody, such as wisdom, empathy, and restraint.
In contrast, the paper frames Kamala Harris as a capable and dedicated public servant. The editorial acknowledges that Harris is not without her critics, and that she may not be the ideal candidate for every voter. However, it emphasizes that she offers a patriotic and stable alternative, particularly in a race where one candidate poses a significant threat to democratic values. Harris’s background as a senator, vice president, and state attorney general demonstrates her ability to uphold the Constitution, work across party lines, and advocate for policies aimed at improving American lives.
Why Trump is Deemed Unfit
The editorial spends significant time focusing on why Trump is unsuitable for another term in office. Beyond his legal issues, the Times notes that Trump’s general approach to governing is at odds with the principles that have traditionally defined the presidency. His disregard for institutional norms, his attacks on democratic institutions, and his coziness with authoritarian leaders such as Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un are deeply concerning to the paper. His policy track record, according to the Times, reflects his reckless approach to governance. The board critiques Trump for using the presidency to pursue his own interests rather than the nation’s and for damaging America’s standing on the global stage.
The paper also highlights the former president’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election and instigate the January 6 Capitol insurrection, which marked a dangerous assault on democracy. Trump’s unwillingness to accept the 2020 election results, coupled with his ongoing false claims that the election was stolen, further disqualifies him from holding the office again. The Times also expresses concern about Trump’s statements promising to be a “dictator” in his second term, a chilling declaration that may reflect his desire to govern without checks and balances.
Kamala Harris: The Right Choice
On the other hand, Kamala Harris is positioned as a competent leader with a vision rooted in constitutional respect, equity, and opportunity for all Americans. The Times endorsement stresses that while Harris may not be perfect, her approach to governance is driven by care for the country’s long-term stability. Harris’s platform, which includes expanding healthcare access, making life more affordable for families, and addressing climate change, is seen as a forward-thinking agenda.
The Times editorial also highlights Harris’s commitment to maintaining global alliances, which have been critical to America’s security and influence abroad. The paper commends her pragmatic stance on immigration, healthcare, and economic policies that prioritize working families and middle-class prosperity. Harris’s approach to health care, especially her defense of reproductive rights, stands in stark contrast to Trump’s attempts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act and his appointment of Supreme Court justices who ended constitutional protections for abortion.
A Clear Choice in 2024
In an election where the stakes couldn’t be higher, The New York Times believes that the decision between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump is not simply a matter of policy preference but a fundamental question of leadership, democracy, and the future of the country. The editorial argues that Trump’s return to the White House would bring unprecedented threats to democracy, citing his disdain for the rule of law, willingness to surround himself with sycophants, and his quest to consolidate power. The paper contrasts this vision with Harris’s dedication to public service and adherence to democratic values.
For the Times, Harris represents not just a viable alternative but a leader who understands the responsibility of the presidency. Her ability to navigate complex challenges, work with allies, and offer practical solutions to issues like climate change, healthcare, and the economy makes her the best candidate to lead the country. The editorial board closes by urging Americans to consider what’s truly at stake: a stable, just democracy versus a presidency driven by self-interest and authoritarian tendencies.
Ultimately, the Times endorses Kamala Harris as the best hope for preserving the integrity of the United States and steering the nation toward a more prosperous, inclusive future.
