Zeldin Shuts Down EPA Climate Justice Exhibit

Zeldin Shuts Down EPA Climate Justice Exhibit \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the permanent closure of the agency’s Washington, D.C. museum, citing high costs and low visitor turnout. The museum, focused on environmental justice and climate change, drew fewer than 2,000 visitors in a year and cost $600,000 annually. Zeldin called it an example of government waste under Biden.

EPA Museum Shutdown: Quick Looks

• EPA museum in Washington, D.C. closed by Administrator Lee Zeldin
• Built for $4 million, it had under 2,000 visitors in one year
• Operating cost was $600,000 annually — $315 per visitor
• Museum featured environmental history and policy exhibits
• Zeldin criticized focus on climate change and environmental justice
• Accused museum of ideological bias and Biden-era waste
• Historical items included LBJ’s Clean Air Act pen, “Silent Spring”
• Museum excluded Trump-era EPA actions, Zeldin claims
• EPA website scrubbed of museum information after closure
• Closure part of Zeldin’s plan to slash agency spending

Deep Look

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced this week that the Environmental Protection Agency will permanently shut down its climate- and environmental justice-themed museum at the agency’s Washington, D.C. headquarters, a move he claims will save taxpayers approximately $600,000 per year. The museum, which cost $4 million to construct and opened just last year, reportedly drew fewer than 2,000 visitors—a statistic Zeldin highlighted as evidence of wasteful spending under the Biden administration.

Framing the museum as an “ideologically slanted” and politically motivated exhibit, Zeldin posted a video Monday from inside the one-room gallery, accusing the Biden-era EPA of prioritizing storytelling over substance. He criticized the museum for focusing heavily on environmental justice (EJ) and climate change, both of which are cornerstone themes of President Biden’s environmental policy.

“This shrine to EJ and climate change will now be shut down for good,” Zeldin stated. He added that the facility served as “yet another example of waste by the Biden administration.”

The museum, nestled inside EPA headquarters, had showcased a curated timeline of the agency’s history, including major legislative and environmental milestones. Artifacts on display included a pen used by President Lyndon B. Johnson to sign the 1967 amendments to the Clean Air Act, and a first edition of Rachel Carson’s 1962 book, Silent Spring—widely credited with launching the modern environmental movement.

Visitors could also view displays covering the EPA’s founding under President Richard Nixon in 1970, the creation of the Superfund program to clean up hazardous waste, and the federal response to the 2010 BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. However, Zeldin claimed that the museum “conveniently” omitted any reference to the Trump administration’s environmental policy efforts, suggesting the exhibit had been curated to reflect a partisan agenda rather than a complete institutional history.

Zeldin contends the museum’s limited audience—fewer than 2,000 visitors in one year—makes it unjustifiable to maintain. While admission was free, operating costs drove the per-visitor cost to an estimated $315, according to his office. “That’s not sustainable, and it’s not fair to the American taxpayer,” Zeldin said. “We can educate the public on the EPA’s mission of clean air, water, and land without spending over half a million dollars a year on a room few people ever enter.”

The decision aligns with Zeldin’s broader campaign to reduce the EPA’s budget footprint. Since taking over the agency, he has pledged to “rein in runaway spending” and shift focus from what he describes as “politically motivated storytelling” toward core environmental functions and measurable outcomes. His recent actions—including rolling back climate communications initiatives and halting some community outreach grants—have drawn both praise and criticism from across the political spectrum.

Zeldin’s critics argue that closing the museum undermines public engagement and transparency, particularly at a time when environmental awareness and education are critical. Supporters of the museum say it provided an accessible way for the public, students, and researchers to explore the history of environmental regulation and federal environmental achievements.

“It’s about more than artifacts,” said one former EPA staffer familiar with the museum’s creation. “It’s about understanding how public policy evolves and how agencies like the EPA serve the American people. Shutting it down sends the wrong message.”

But for Zeldin and other conservatives, the museum symbolized federal overreach and ideological mission creep, especially as it leaned heavily into themes of environmental justice—a term that generally refers to the disproportionate environmental harm borne by low-income and minority communities. While environmental justice is a top priority in the Biden administration’s EPA strategy, opponents like Zeldin see it as a politicized framework.

Information about the museum was quietly removed from the EPA’s website shortly after Zeldin’s video was published. The closure took effect immediately, and it’s unclear whether any of the artifacts will be relocated or made available through other channels, such as digital archives or educational partnerships.

The museum’s fate illustrates the broader political divide over how the EPA’s role should be presented to the public—as a neutral enforcer of environmental law or as a storytelling platform advocating for progressive policies like climate action and environmental justice.

Zeldin’s actions also reflect a sharp departure from President Biden’s approach. Under Biden, the EPA was empowered to take an expanded role in addressing climate change, environmental equity, and public outreach. Zeldin’s tenure appears aimed at reversing that course, reducing what he sees as distractions from the agency’s “core mission,” and framing taxpayer efficiency as a top priority.

The closure is the latest in a series of steps taken by Trump-aligned officials to reshape the federal bureaucracy ahead of the 2024 election. It’s likely to be followed by further reductions in what Zeldin has called “public relations spending disguised as education.”

Whether the closure will affect public understanding of the EPA’s legacy remains to be seen, but it has already stirred a fresh round of debate over how federal agencies should balance fiscal accountability with their responsibility to educate and engage the American public.

More on US News

Zeldin Shuts Down